Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1994 Feb;8(2):281-8.

Altered susceptibility of differentiating HL-60 cells to apoptosis induced by antitumor drugs

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7508535

Altered susceptibility of differentiating HL-60 cells to apoptosis induced by antitumor drugs

G Del Bino et al. Leukemia. 1994 Feb.

Abstract

It has been reported that human promyelocytic leukemic HL-60 cells which undergo differentiation fail to respond by apoptosis when treated with antitumor drugs, predominantly DNA topoisomerase inhibitors. Because S phase cells are selectively sensitive to these drugs, and during differentiation there is a reduction in the proportion of cells in S phase, the reported decrease in the number of apoptotic cells could simply be a reflection of the paucity of sensitive cells in these cultures. Using cytometric methods which allow apoptosis to be related to cell cycle position, we have compared the apoptotic response of HL-60 cells growing exponentially and induced to myeloid differentiation by dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). The cells were treated with: (i) the DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin (CAM), which selectively triggers apoptosis or S phase cells; (ii) the nucleoside antimetabolite 5-azacytidine (AZC) and hyperthermia, both of which preferentially affects G1 cells; and (iii) gamma radiation, which causes apoptosis predominantly of G2 + M cells. The cells exposed to 1.4% DMSO for 24 or 48 h were significantly more resistant to response by apoptosis, regardless of the nature of the agent and regardless of their position in the cell cycle. Thus, induction of differentiation lowers the cell's ability to respond to a variety of damaging agents by apoptosis and this effect is not correlated with cell cycle position. In addition, the difference in response was unrelated to expression of the apoptosis-modulating protein bcl-2, which appeared unchanged following 48 h exposure to DMSO. On the other hand, when the cells were pretreated with low concentrations of CAM or AZC, washed free of drug, and then treated with DMSO, the proportion of cells undergoing apoptosis was markedly increased, relative to drug-treated cells returned to DMSO-free medium. The present data may indicate that while the drug-induced damage screening mechanisms, which are linked to triggering apoptosis, may be more proficient in proliferating cells, the effectors of apoptosis are more expressed in cells undergoing differentiation. The data also suggest that the efficiency of chemotherapeutic agents or radiation may be reduced if a differentiating agent is used in combination therapy and is administered first. An enhancement of apoptosis, however, may be expected if the differentiating drug is administered in the reverse sequence.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources