International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules
- PMID: 7508544
- DOI: 10.1016/0027-5107(94)90123-6
International Commission for Protection Against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. The subtlety of alkylating agents in reactions with biological macromolecules
Abstract
Genotoxic agents known to modify DNA by alkylation reactions (alkylating agents, AAs), either directly or after metabolic conversion to ultimately reactive intermediates, by no means represent a homogeneous class. For instance, their effectiveness for genotoxic damage, when expressed as the number of events (e.g., mutations) per unit exposure dose, varies over a more than 1-million-fold range in dose. Despite the multiplicity of chemical and biological processes involved between DNA adduct formation and expression of genotoxic damage, the principal aims of studies on structure-activity relationships (SARs) are to (a) dissect the multi-step process of genetic damage formation into its most essential components, (b) use SARs for making predictions and, at a later step (c) as a basis for regulatory measures. The analytical tools available for such a comprehensive analysis in eukaryotic systems include determination of multiple genetic endpoints: molecular mutation spectra, relative clastogenicity (clastogenic events in relation to forward mutation induction) and the quantitative measure of enhanced mutagenicity in repair-deficient conditions. The genetic activity profiles obtained in this way can then be compared with fundamental physico-chemical properties of the AAs under consideration (such as Swain-Scott's s value, a useful indicator of the selectivity of an AA in its reactions with nucleophiles of distinct nucleophilic strength n in DNA, RNA and proteins), their functionality (monofunctional versus cross-linking) and their tumorigenic potency (TD50s compared with measures of initial DNA interaction, i.e., O6-/N7-alkylguanine ratios, s values or the covalent binding index determined in the liver in vivo). The combination of these different methods revealed that carcinogenic potencies of AAs in rodents vary over a 10,000-fold range in dose, with the extremes having the following characteristics: (i) Chemicals of a relatively "high carcinogenic potency", as indicated by a low TD50 in rodents, either have low nucleophilic selectivity (and therefore mainly act through O-alkylation in DNA) or are capable of cross-linking DNA. The monofunctional members of this group, typified by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea, are active in both spermatogonia and post-spermatogonial stages in the mouse and in Drosophila. Cross-linking agents also have a low TD50 value in rodents but are expected generally not to display genetic action in premeiotic stages (exceptions mitomycin C and chlorambucil). (ii) A relatively low carcinogenic potential is associated with AAs of high Swain-Scott s values, typified by trimethyl phosphate, epichlorohydrin or methyl methanesulphonate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
Similar articles
-
DNA damage and repair in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: implications of structure-activity relationships for cross-species extrapolation.Mutat Res. 1996 Jun 12;353(1-2):177-218. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(96)00032-2. Mutat Res. 1996. PMID: 8692191 Review.
-
DNA damage and repair in somatic and germ cells in vivo.Mutat Res. 1995 Aug;330(1-2):183-208. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(95)00040-p. Mutat Res. 1995. PMID: 7623865 Review.
-
Nucleophilic selectivity of alkylating agents and their hypermutability in Drosophila as predictors of carcinogenic potency in rodents.Carcinogenesis. 1990 Dec;11(12):2211-7. doi: 10.1093/carcin/11.12.2211. Carcinogenesis. 1990. PMID: 2265471
-
Nucleophilic selectivity as a determinant of carcinogenic potency (TD50) in rodents: a comparison of mono- and bi-functional alkylating agents and vinyl chloride metabolites.Mutat Res. 1989 Nov;215(1):95-106. doi: 10.1016/0027-5107(89)90222-4. Mutat Res. 1989. PMID: 2811916
-
Germ cell mutagenesis in Drosophila: multiple endpoint analysis.Acta Biochim Pol. 1998;45(2):545-59. Acta Biochim Pol. 1998. PMID: 9821883
Cited by
-
Both PIGA and PIGL mutations cause GPI-a deficient isolates in the Tk6 cell line.Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015 Oct;56(8):663-73. doi: 10.1002/em.21953. Epub 2015 May 13. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2015. PMID: 25970100 Free PMC article.
-
Mutations at the Asc locus of tomato confer resistance to the fungal pathogen Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici.Theor Appl Genet. 1996 May;92(7):898-904. doi: 10.1007/BF00221904. Theor Appl Genet. 1996. PMID: 24166557
-
Alcohol and Head and Neck Cancer: Updates on the Role of Oxidative Stress, Genetic, Epigenetics, Oral Microbiota, Antioxidants, and Alkylating Agents.Antioxidants (Basel). 2022 Jan 11;11(1):145. doi: 10.3390/antiox11010145. Antioxidants (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35052649 Free PMC article. Review.
-
In vivo suppressor mutations correct a murine model of hereditary tyrosinemia type I.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Oct 12;96(21):11928-33. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.21.11928. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999. PMID: 10518553 Free PMC article.
-
Formation and signaling actions of electrophilic lipids.Chem Rev. 2011 Oct 12;111(10):5997-6021. doi: 10.1021/cr200131e. Epub 2011 Sep 20. Chem Rev. 2011. PMID: 21928855 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Molecular Biology Databases
Miscellaneous