A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study
- PMID: 7515652
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/5.suppl_2.s91
A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study
Abstract
Background: CHOP is a four-drug, first-generation combination chemotherapy regimen that has cured approximately 30% of all patients with advanced stages of intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in national cooperative group trials. Initial single-institution studies of third-generation regimens such as m-BACOD, ProMACE-CytaBOM, and MACOP-B suggested that 55%-60% of these patients might be cured.
Patients and methods: In order to make a valid comparison between these regimens, the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a randomized phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B. Endpoints of the study were response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and severe or life-threatening toxicity. Received dose intensity calculations and subset analyses were also performed.
Results: 1138 patients were registered on this clinical trial. Each treatment arm contained between 218 and 233 eligible patients. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed. The initial results of this study were recently published. There were no significant differences in either the partial or complete response rates between treatment arms. Now after a median follow-up of 49 months and a maximum follow-up of 84 months, there is still no difference in time to treatment failure (p = 0.40) or overall survival (p = 0.68). No subset of patients was found to have significantly improved survival with the third-generation regimens. The received dose intensity data were comparable to previously published data for these regimens. Fatal toxicity was 1% for CHOP, 3% for ProMACE-CytaBOM, 5% for m-BACOD, and 6% for MACOP-B.
Conclusion: Based on similar failure-free and overall survival with lower cost and lower severe toxicity, CHOP remains the standard chemotherapy for patients with advanced-stage, intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. New treatment strategies need to be developed to improve the prognosis of these patients.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 7680764 Clinical Trial.
-
Advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Analysis of prognostic factors by the international index and by lactic dehydrogenase in an intergroup study.Cancer. 1995 Feb 1;75(3):865-73. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950201)75:3<865::aid-cncr2820750319>3.0.co;2-z. Cancer. 1995. PMID: 7530168 Clinical Trial.
-
MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jul;12(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.7.1366. J Clin Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7517442 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin' lymphomas. Lessons from the past 10 years.Cancer. 1994 Nov 1;74(9 Suppl):2657-61. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941101)74:9+<2657::aid-cncr2820741812>3.0.co;2-t. Cancer. 1994. PMID: 7525045 Review.
-
Long-term follow-up of ProMACE-CytaBOM in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.Ann Oncol. 1991 Jan;2 Suppl 1:33-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.33. Ann Oncol. 1991. PMID: 1710487 Review.
Cited by
-
Fludarabine in the management of malignant lymphomas.Drugs. 1994;47 Suppl 6:50-6. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199400476-00008. Drugs. 1994. PMID: 7525189 Review.
-
Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in adults--are we doing any better?Med Oncol. 1996 Dec;13(4):185-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02990930. Med Oncol. 1996. PMID: 9152968 Review.
-
NHL (diffuse large B cell lymphoma).BMJ Clin Evid. 2008 Jan 18;2008:2401. BMJ Clin Evid. 2008. PMID: 19450335 Free PMC article.
-
Novel therapies in peripheral T-cell lymphomas.Curr Oncol Rep. 2008 Sep;10(5):404-11. doi: 10.1007/s11912-008-0062-3. Curr Oncol Rep. 2008. PMID: 18706268 Review.
-
Past, present and future therapeutic approaches in nodal peripheral T-cell lymphomas.Haematologica. 2023 Dec 1;108(12):3211-3226. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280275. Haematologica. 2023. PMID: 38037799 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials