Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1994 Jun;60(6):315-20.

[Comparison between low and high doses of aprotinin in heart surgery]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7527131
Clinical Trial

[Comparison between low and high doses of aprotinin in heart surgery]

[Article in Italian]
M Maccario et al. Minerva Anestesiol. 1994 Jun.

Abstract

High dose aprotinin has been used in cardiac surgery (Royston 1987) to reduce post operative bleeding. A low dose aprotinin ie 2000000 KIU in the oxygenator prime, has been also proposed. OBJECTIVE. To evaluate postoperative losses and holomogous blood transfusions, in patients undergoing cardiac surgery treated with low and high dose aprotinin. METHODS AND MATERIALS. Ninety-nine patients, between January and May 1993, have randomized in 3 groups: A, high dose aprotinin; B, low dose aprotinin; C, control. All patients were treated with additional blood saving techniques routinely used in our center. Statistical analysis was performed by means of ANOVA and Tukey Kramer test. MAIN RESULTS. Five patients (3 in group A, 1 each in groups B and C) have been excluded during the trial. The groups resulted omogeneus and comparable. Total blood losses were 372 +/- 159 ml in group A, 401 +/- 178 ml in group B (difference are not significative); the 621 +/- 255 m1 in group C are highly significative. Patients transfused were 18.7% in group C, 10.34% in group A and 6.20% in group B. CONCLUSIONS. Effects of low dose aprotinin are comparable to high dose. Further advantages with low dose are reduction of collateral effects and intolerance phenomena and a better cost benefits ratio.

PubMed Disclaimer