The most promising surrogate endpoint biomarkers for screening candidate chemopreventive compounds for prostatic adenocarcinoma in short-term phase II clinical trials
- PMID: 7529857
The most promising surrogate endpoint biomarkers for screening candidate chemopreventive compounds for prostatic adenocarcinoma in short-term phase II clinical trials
Abstract
Surrogate endpoint biomarkers (SEBs) are needed in clinical chemoprevention trials to avoid the excessively long study periods and high costs associated with the use of cancer incidence reduction as an endpoint, particularly with relatively slow-growing tumors such as prostatic adenocarcinoma. SEBs should be directly associated with the evolution of neoplasia, and develop with high frequency in abnormal cells of susceptible individuals. If SEBs can be modified by a particular intervention regimen in short-term studies, the rationale for carrying out long-term studies may be strengthened. The consensus panel identified a small and manageable group of biomarkers measured in tissue or serum as the most promising in prostate cancer chemoprevention, including (1) prostate specific antigen (PSA); (2) morphometric markers, such as nuclear size and roundness; (3) proliferation markers, such as MIB-1 and PCNA; (4) nuclear DNA content (ploidy); (5) oncogene c-erbB-2 (HER-2/neu) expression; (6) angiogenesis; and (7) high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN). Information regarding many of these and other biomarkers is limited, calling for further investigation. Also, these factors, chosen chiefly for their proven or proposed utility as prognostic factors, may be less useful as SEBs. It was agreed that concurrent study of numerous markers rather than single markers allows comparison of their relative utility, including assessment of ease of quantitation and the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value.
Similar articles
-
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) and other prostatic lesions as risk factors and surrogate endpoints for cancer chemoprevention trials.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996;25:156-64. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996. PMID: 9027613 Review.
-
Risk biomarkers and current strategies for cancer chemoprevention.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996;25:1-14. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1996. PMID: 9027592 Review.
-
Progress in cancer chemoprevention: perspectives on agent selection and short-term clinical intervention trials.Cancer Res. 1994 Apr 1;54(7 Suppl):2015s-2024s. Cancer Res. 1994. PMID: 8137331 Review.
-
Target populations and strategies for chemoprevention trials of prostate cancer.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994;19:191-6. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994. PMID: 7823591 Review.
-
Surrogate endpoint biomarkers for phase II cancer chemoprevention trials.J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994;19:1-9. J Cell Biochem Suppl. 1994. PMID: 7823579 Review.
Cited by
-
High-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and prostate cancer risk reduction.World J Urol. 2003 May;21(1):15-20. doi: 10.1007/s00345-002-0313-0. Epub 2003 Feb 21. World J Urol. 2003. PMID: 12756489 Review.
-
Short-term cellular effects induced by castration therapy in relation to clinical outcome in prostate cancer.Br J Cancer. 1998 Feb;77(4):670-5. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1998.107. Br J Cancer. 1998. PMID: 9484828 Free PMC article.
-
Precursor lesions for prostate cancer.J R Soc Med. 1997 Oct;90(10):533-9. doi: 10.1177/014107689709001003. J R Soc Med. 1997. PMID: 9488009 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Chemoprevention strategies in the prostate: an overview.Rev Urol. 2002 Spring;4(2):69-77. Rev Urol. 2002. PMID: 16985658 Free PMC article.
-
Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.Curr Urol Rep. 2000 May;1(1):65-70. doi: 10.1007/s11934-000-0037-x. Curr Urol Rep. 2000. PMID: 12084343 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous