Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Feb 28;92(5):1590-4.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1590.

Opposing mechanisms of regulation of a G-protein-coupled inward rectifier K+ channel in rat brain neurons

Affiliations

Opposing mechanisms of regulation of a G-protein-coupled inward rectifier K+ channel in rat brain neurons

B M Velimirovic et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

In locus coeruleus neurons, substance P (SP) suppresses an inwardly rectifying K+ current via a pertussis toxin-insensitive guanine nucleotide binding protein (G protein; GnonPTX), whereas somatostatin (SOM) or [Met]enkephalin (MENK) enhances it via a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein (GPTX). The interaction of the SP and the SOM (or MENK) effects was studied in cultured locus coeruleus neurons. In neurons loaded with guanosine 5'-[gamma-thio]triphosphate (GTP[gamma S]), application of SOM (or MENK) evoked a persistent increase in the inward rectifier K+ conductance. A subsequent application of SP suppressed this conductance to a level less than that before the SOM (or MENK) application; the final conductance level was independent of the magnitude of the SOM (or MENK) response. This suppression by SP was persistent, and a subsequent SOM (or MENK) application did not reverse it. When SP was applied to GTP[gamma S]-loaded cells first, subsequent SOM elicited only a small response. In GTP-loaded neurons, application of SP temporarily suppressed the subsequent SOM- (or MENK)-induced conductance increase. These results suggest that the same inward rectifier molecule that responds to an opening signal from GPTX also responds to a closing signal from GnonPTX. The closing signal is stronger than the opening signal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Nature. 1987 Jan 8-14;325(7000):153-6 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1993 Aug 26;364(6440):802-6 - PubMed
    1. Eur J Neurosci. 1993 Sep 1;5(9):1189-97 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 29;91(7):2853-7 - PubMed
    1. J Physiol. 1978 Jul;280:169-91 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources