Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Sep;45(398):485-8.

Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective

Affiliations

Confidentiality of medical records: the patient's perspective

D Carman et al. Br J Gen Pract. 1995 Sep.

Abstract

Background: The development of modern information technology and the increasing amount of multidisciplinary teamwork in primary health care mean that the principle of patient confidentiality is becoming difficult to uphold. The debate about confidentiality so far has paid little attention to patients' views.

Aim: A qualitative study was undertaken to explore patients' expectations and attitudes concerning confidentiality of patients' medical records in general practice.

Method: Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 39 patients from one general practice.

Results: Patients' expectations diverged considerably from actual practice. The majority of interviewees felt that administrative and secretarial staff should not have access to medical records. Some patients had reservations about a doctor not directly involved in their care having access to their records. They were unaware of the fact that practice staff had ready access to their medical records. Interviewees had particular concerns about recording of nonmedical information in their records, and the confidentiality of computerized records.

Conclusion: Assumptions of shared doctor-patient definitions of confidentiality, at least in this practice, would be misplaced. It is suggested that explicit negotiations about what is recorded in patients' records would go some way to addressing the discrepancies identified in this study.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. N Engl J Med. 1982 Dec 9;307(24):1518-21 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1984 Aug;77(8):656-62 - PubMed
    1. Br J Gen Pract. 1991 Apr;41(345):136, 138 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1988 Sep;81(9):520-2 - PubMed
    1. J R Soc Med. 1991 May;84(5):284-7 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources