Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995;4(3):148-52.
doi: 10.1007/BF00298239.

Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Active treatment programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a prospective, randomized, observer-blinded study

A F Bendix et al. Eur Spine J. 1995.

Abstract

Several new studies have indicated that an active approach to patients with chronic disabling low back pain (LBP) seems effective. Some of these studies emphasize the importance of dealing with the patient's total situation in comprehensive multidisciplinary programs--the bio-psycho-social model. However, these programs are expensive. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rehabilitation outcome from three different active programs in terms of: (1) return-to-work rate, (2) days of sick leave, (3) health-care contacts, (4) pain and disability scores, and (5) staying physically active. The subjects included 132 patients randomized to the study, of whom 123 started one of the treatment programs. They had all had at least 6 months of chronic LBP. The patients were randomized into one of three programs: group 1--a full-time, intensive 3-week multidisciplinary program, including active physical and ergonomic training and psychological pain management, followed by 1 day weekly for the subsequent 3 weeks; group 2--active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, for a total of 24h; group 3--psychological pain management combined with active physical training, twice a week for 6 weeks, also for a total of 24h. The results presented here are based on data collected 4 months following treatment, which shows an 86% response rate. The initial examination and the follow-up evaluation were performed by a blinded observer. The results show that 4 months after treatment, the intensive multidisciplinary program is superior to the less intensive programs in terms of return-to-work rate, health-care contacts, pain and disability scores, and staying physically active.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Neurosurgery. 1993 Jul;33(1):73-8; discussion 78-9 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1984 Mar;9(2):204-8 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Jun;17(6):653-62 - PubMed
    1. BMJ. 1991 Jun 29;302(6792):1572-6 - PubMed
    1. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992 Aug;17(8):988-95 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources