End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92
- PMID: 7552796
- DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05060366.x
End-result of routine ultrasound screening for congenital anomalies: the Belgian Multicentric Study 1984-92
Abstract
Five ultrasound laboratories from Obstetrics and Gynecology departments of Belgian university hospitals or affiliated institutions conducted a prospective study from 1984 to 1992 in which the results of prenatal ultrasound examinations were compared to examination reports of the neonates. The results of the period 1984-89 (PI) have been published previously, and those of the period 1990-92 (PII) are presented here. Some very minor congenital anomalies, as listed and defined in the EUROCAT Register, were excluded. Of 26,147 pregnant women at normal risk for congenital anomalies, 25,046 had at least one ultrasound scan (96%). A total of 616 fetuses were structurally abnormal (prevalence 2.42%), and 685 abnormalities were recorded. The sensitivity of the ultrasound test was 40.4% in PI and 51.1% in PII for abnormal fetuses (p < 0.05), and 45% (PI) and 64% (PII) for abnormalities (p < 0.01). The specificity was 99.9% and the positive and negative predictive values were 94.2% and 98.6%, respectively; these values did not differ significantly between the two periods. The sensitivity for the detection of anomalies before 23 weeks increased from 21% in PI to 41% in PII, indicating an improvement in the early detection of fetal abnormalities.
Comment in
-
Fetal structural disorders--the large series are emerging.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;5(6):364-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1995.05060364.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995. PMID: 7552795 Review. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Sensitivity and specificity of routine antenatal screening for congenital anomalies by ultrasound: the Belgian Multicentric Study.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Mar 1;1(2):102-10. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.1991.01020102.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991. PMID: 12797083
-
Effectiveness of prenatal ultrasonography in detecting fetal anomalies and perinatal outcome of anomalous fetuses.Yonsei Med J. 1998 Aug;39(4):372-82. doi: 10.3349/ymj.1998.39.4.372. Yonsei Med J. 1998. PMID: 9752805
-
Routine ultrasound screening and detection of congenital anomalies outside a university setting.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005 Nov;84(11):1042-8. doi: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00785.x. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2005. PMID: 16232170
-
Comprehensive ultrasound examination in a private perinatal practice.Am J Perinatol. 1995 Nov;12(6):385-91. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-994504. Am J Perinatol. 1995. PMID: 8579646 Review.
-
How often do we identify fetal abnormalities during routine third-trimester ultrasound? A systematic review and meta-analysis.BJOG. 2021 Jan;128(2):259-269. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16468. Epub 2020 Sep 20. BJOG. 2021. PMID: 32790134
Cited by
-
First-Trimester Detection of Surface Abnormalities: A Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Ultrasound and 3-Dimensional Virtual Reality Ultrasound.Reprod Sci. 2014 Aug;21(8):993-999. doi: 10.1177/1933719113519172. Epub 2014 Jan 18. Reprod Sci. 2014. PMID: 24440996 Free PMC article.
-
Fetal structural anomalies diagnosed during the first, second and third trimesters of pregnancy using ultrasonography: a retrospective cohort study.Sao Paulo Med J. 2019 Sep-Oct;137(5):391-400. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2019.026906082019. Sao Paulo Med J. 2019. PMID: 31939566 Free PMC article.
-
Audit of the appropriateness of the indication for obstetric sonography in a tertiary facility in Ghana.Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Sep 14;40:35. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.35.26349. eCollection 2021. Pan Afr Med J. 2021. PMID: 34795816 Free PMC article.
-
Prevalence of anomalies on the routine mid-trimester ultrasound: 3172 consecutive cases by a single maternal-fetal medicine specialist.Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Nov 20;27(1):12-18. doi: 10.1002/ajum.12369. eCollection 2024 Feb. Australas J Ultrasound Med. 2023. PMID: 38434547 Free PMC article.
-
Global Birth Prevalence of Spina Bifida by Folic Acid Fortification Status: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Am J Public Health. 2016 Jan;106(1):e24-34. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302902. Epub 2015 Nov 12. Am J Public Health. 2016. PMID: 26562127 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous