Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety
- PMID: 7553572
- PMCID: PMC174631
- DOI: 10.1128/CMR.8.3.389
Laboratory-associated infections and biosafety
Abstract
An estimated 500,000 laboratory workers in the United States are at risk of exposure to infectious agents that cause disease ranging from inapparent to life-threatening infections, but the precise risk to a given worker unknown. The emergence of human immunodeficiency virus and hantavirus, the continuing problem of hepatitis B virus, and the reemergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis have renewed interest in biosafety for the employees of laboratories and health care facilities. This review examines the history, the causes, and the methods for prevention of laboratory-associated infections. The initial step in a biosafety program is the assessment of risk to the employee. Risk assessment guidelines include the pathogenicity of the infectious agent, the method of transmission, worker-related risk factors, the source and route of infection, and the design of the laboratory facility. Strategies for the prevention and management of laboratory-associated infections are based on the containment of the infectious agent by physical separation from the laboratory worker and the environment, employee education about the occupational risks, and availability of an employee health program. Adherence to the biosafety guidelines mandated or proposed by various governmental and accrediting agencies reduces the risk of an occupational exposure to infectious agents handled in the workplace.
Similar articles
-
Improved Biosafety and Biosecurity Measures and/or Strategies to Tackle Laboratory-Acquired Infections and Related Risks.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Nov 29;15(12):2697. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15122697. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018. PMID: 30501091 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biosafety: guidelines for working with pathogenic and infectious microorganisms.Curr Protoc Immunol. 2005 Nov;Appendix 1:A.1V.1-A.1V.8. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.ima01vs69. Curr Protoc Immunol. 2005. PMID: 18432937
-
Design and Construction of a Biosafety Level 3 Autopsy Laboratory.Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021 Apr 1;145(4):407-414. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2020-0644-SA. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2021. PMID: 33307551
-
Biosafety considerations for autopsy.Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002 Jun;23(2):107-22. doi: 10.1097/00000433-200206000-00001. Am J Forensic Med Pathol. 2002. PMID: 12040252 Review.
-
Survey of Suspected Laboratory-Acquired Infections and Biosafety Practices in Research, Clinical, and Veterinary Laboratories in Karachi, Pakistan.Health Secur. 2019 Sep/Oct;17(5):372-383. doi: 10.1089/hs.2019.0057. Health Secur. 2019. PMID: 31593511
Cited by
-
Biosafety Training and Incident-reporting Practices in the United States: A 2008 Survey of Biosafety Professionals.Appl Biosaf. 2009;14(3):135-143. doi: 10.1177/153567600901400305. Appl Biosaf. 2009. PMID: 20890389 Free PMC article.
-
Gene disruption in Coccidioides using hygromycin or phleomycin resistance markers.Methods Mol Biol. 2012;845:131-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-539-8_9. Methods Mol Biol. 2012. PMID: 22328372 Free PMC article.
-
Laboratory biosafety for handling emerging viruses.Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017 May;7(5):483-491. doi: 10.1016/j.apjtb.2017.01.020. Epub 2017 Jan 7. Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 2017. PMID: 32289025 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Assessment of biosafety precautions in Khartoum state diagnostic laboratories, Sudan.Pan Afr Med J. 2012;11:19. Epub 2012 Feb 3. Pan Afr Med J. 2012. PMID: 22514753 Free PMC article.
-
Surveillance of laboratory exposures to human pathogens and toxins: Canada 2018.Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019 Sep 5;45(9):244-251. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v45i09a04. eCollection 2019 Sep 5. Can Commun Dis Rep. 2019. PMID: 31650987 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources