Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Oct;38(10):1080-3.
doi: 10.1007/BF02133982.

Internal rectal intussusception--fact or fancy?

Affiliations
Free article

Internal rectal intussusception--fact or fancy?

W F van Tets et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Oct.
Free article

Abstract

Purpose: There is still considerable debate whether internal intussusception represents a functional disorder. We have reviewed our results in an effort to define its symptomatology and to assess defecography.

Methods: Rectopexy has been performed for internal intussusception in 37 patients. Eighteen had solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS), and 31 had anterior rectal wall prolapse. Defecography demonstrated anterior wall prolapse in 13, circular prolapse in 21, and no disorders in 3 patients. Pelvic floor function was normal. Follow-up varied from one to nine years.

Results: Twenty-six patients became asymptomatic. Anterior wall prolapses could not be palpated anymore. All SRUS lesions healed. Patients with SRUS (P < 0.001) or circular prolapse (P < 0.001) became significantly more asymptomatic. Results in patients with anterior rectal wall prolapse were significantly worse (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Internal intussusception is a distinct functional rectal disorder. Its symptomatology and findings during physical examination are aspecific. Characteristic defecographic features and presence of SRUS are indications for surgery, provided pelvic floor function during straining is normal.

PubMed Disclaimer

LinkOut - more resources