[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography]
- PMID: 7557034
[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography]
Abstract
Background: The simple determination of transaortic pressure gradient does not accurately assess the severity of an aortic valve stenosis. Thus, estimating the aortic valve area (AVA) is vital for clinical decision-making. Cardiac catheterization has been considered the "gold-standard" for the quantification of the stenotic valve area, but this technique may underestimate the actual valve area when aortic regurgitation is associated. Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the continuity equation method is usually employed for AVA estimation. Recently, in pure aortic stenosis, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has provided AVA values well-correlated to hemodynamic invasive results.
Methods: In this study, we correlated AVA values by TTE and multiplane TEE in 18 patients with combined aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation.
Results: The mean values of AVA by TEE and TTE were 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.68 +/- 0.55 cm2, respectively (p = NS). TEE-derived AVA correlated well to TTE-derived AVA (r = 0.816; p < 0.0001). Critical aortic stenosis was predicted by TEE with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Total time of examination was significantly longer for TTE (p < 0.00001).
Conclusions: In conclusion, direct planimetry by multiplane TEE is a reliable method for AVA determination in aortic stenoinsufficiency. For this purpose, when the technical quality of TTE study is poor or when the patient is critically ill and does not tolerate a longer lasting TTE, multiplane TEE should be considered.
Similar articles
-
Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.Cardiology. 2008;109(2):126-34. doi: 10.1159/000105554. Epub 2007 Aug 21. Cardiology. 2008. PMID: 17713328
-
Two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area in adults with aortic stenosis.Am Heart J. 1991 Nov;122(5):1415-22. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(91)90585-6. Am Heart J. 1991. PMID: 1951006
-
Grading Aortic Stenosis With Mean Gradient and Aortic Valve Area: A Comparison Between Preoperative Transthoracic and Precardiopulmonary Bypass Transesophageal Echocardiography.J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016 Oct;30(5):1254-9. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 11. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2016. PMID: 27495962
-
Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.Herz. 2006 Oct;31(7):650-7. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2907-6. Herz. 2006. PMID: 17072778 Review.
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review & meta-analysis.J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020 Jun 15;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-00633-z. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020. PMID: 32536342 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Diagnostic Challenges in Aortic Stenosis.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 23;11(6):162. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060162. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38921662 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous