Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Jul;25(7):851-7.

[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography]

[Article in Italian]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7557034
Clinical Trial

[Planar determination of the aortic valve area with transesophageal echocardiography with multiplanar probe in patients with aortic stenosis and insufficiency. Comparison with transthoracic Doppler echocardiography]

[Article in Italian]
S Morelli et al. G Ital Cardiol. 1995 Jul.

Abstract

Background: The simple determination of transaortic pressure gradient does not accurately assess the severity of an aortic valve stenosis. Thus, estimating the aortic valve area (AVA) is vital for clinical decision-making. Cardiac catheterization has been considered the "gold-standard" for the quantification of the stenotic valve area, but this technique may underestimate the actual valve area when aortic regurgitation is associated. Doppler transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with the continuity equation method is usually employed for AVA estimation. Recently, in pure aortic stenosis, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has provided AVA values well-correlated to hemodynamic invasive results.

Methods: In this study, we correlated AVA values by TTE and multiplane TEE in 18 patients with combined aortic valve stenosis and regurgitation.

Results: The mean values of AVA by TEE and TTE were 0.74 +/- 0.12 and 0.68 +/- 0.55 cm2, respectively (p = NS). TEE-derived AVA correlated well to TTE-derived AVA (r = 0.816; p < 0.0001). Critical aortic stenosis was predicted by TEE with 100% sensitivity and specificity. Total time of examination was significantly longer for TTE (p < 0.00001).

Conclusions: In conclusion, direct planimetry by multiplane TEE is a reliable method for AVA determination in aortic stenoinsufficiency. For this purpose, when the technical quality of TTE study is poor or when the patient is critically ill and does not tolerate a longer lasting TTE, multiplane TEE should be considered.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Diagnostic Challenges in Aortic Stenosis.
    González-García A, Pazos-López P, Calvo-Iglesias FE, Matajira-Chía TM, Bilbao-Quesada R, Blanco-González E, González-Ríos C, Castiñeira-Busto M, Barreiro-Pérez M, Íñiguez-Romo A. González-García A, et al. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 May 23;11(6):162. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11060162. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38921662 Free PMC article. Review.

LinkOut - more resources