Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Jun;21(6):469-74.
doi: 10.1007/BF01706199.

Mask physiotherapy in patients after heart surgery: a controlled study

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Mask physiotherapy in patients after heart surgery: a controlled study

K Richter Larsen et al. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Jun.

Abstract

Objective: Investigate the effects of mask physiotherapy on post-operative complications after thoracic surgery.

Design: A prospective, consecutive, randomized, controlled study.

Setting: Department of Thoracic and Heart Surgery at a University Hospital. The treatments were performed by experienced and specially trained physiotherapists.

Patients: 97 low-risk male patients undergoing coronary artery by-pass graft surgery were evaluated. 66 patients completed the study.

Interventions: The patients were treated with routine chest physiotherapy alone or supplied with either positive expiratory pressure (PEP), or inspiratory resistance-positive expiratory pressure (IR-PEP).

Measurements and results: Post-operative pulmonary complications were assessed by forced vital capacity (FVC), arterial oxygen tension (PaO2), and chest X-ray examination, all measured pre-operatively and on the third and sixth post-operative day. There was an almost equal decrease and subsequent rise in spirometric and blood gas values, but patients treated with the PEP mask had a borderly significantly higher increase in PaO2 from day 3 to day 6 compared with patients treated with no mask. There was an almost equal frequency of atelectasis in the 3 treatments. The patients filled in a questionaire expressing their opinion about their treatment. Most patients liked their treatment and found it helpful but a little less so in the IR-PEP group.

Conclusion: We did not find any significant difference between the three groups; however, a tendency to decreased risk of having post-operative complications was observed in the groups having positive expiratory pressure (PEP) and inspiratory resistance-positive expiratory pressure (IR-PEP).

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chest. 1989 Feb;95(2):424-34 - PubMed
    1. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983 Apr;127(4):431-6 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1990 Oct;98(4):878-80 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1986 Aug;90(2):218-21 - PubMed
    1. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1991 Feb;35(2):97-104 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources