Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1995;10(3):126-32.
doi: 10.1007/BF00298532.

Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer

Affiliations
Review

Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer

J L McCall et al. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995.

Abstract

Local recurrence (LR) continues to be a major problem following surgical treatment for rectal cancer, and proposed ways of reducing this remain controversial. The aim of this study was to review results from published surgical series in which adjuvant therapies were not used. A Medline search identified series published between January 1982 and December 1992 with follow-up on at least 50 patients with rectal cancer treated surgically for cure, without adjuvant therapy. Fifty one papers reported follow-up on 10,465 patients with a median LR rate of 18.5%. LR was 8.5%, 16.3% and 28.6% in Dukes' A, B and C patients respectively, 16.2% following anterior resection and 19.3% following abdominoperineal resection. Nine papers (1,176 patients) reported LR rates of 10% or less. LR was 7.1% in 1,033 patients having total mesorectal excision and 12.4% in 476 patients having extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Routine cytocidal stump washout in 1,364 patients was associated with 12.2% LR, however a higher proportion (41%) also underwent total mesorectal excision. In 52% of cases, LR was reported to have occurred with no evidence of disseminated disease. Surgical technique is an important determinant of LR risk. LR rates of 10% or less can be achieved with surgery alone in expert hands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer. 1986 Jul 1;58(1):22-8 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981 Feb;152(2):131-6 - PubMed
    1. Arch Surg. 1993 Apr;128(4):437-40 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1993 Feb 20;341(8843):457-60 - PubMed
    1. Br J Surg. 1988 May;75(5):422-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources