Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead improves by pressure on the probe
- PMID: 7561997
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01617518
Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead improves by pressure on the probe
Abstract
In this study, we investigated the possibility of improving reflectance (back-scatter) pulse oximetry measurements by pressure applied to the probe. Optimal signal detection, with the probe applied to an easily accessible location, is important to prevent erroneous oxygen saturation readouts. At the foreheads of 10 healthy adult volunteers, the effects of pressure applied onto the reflectance pulse oximeter probe were studied. Distances between the LEDs (660 nm and 940 nm) and the three photodiodes in the sensor were 4 mm, 7 mm, and 10 mm. For each detector, recordings were evaluated regarding red-to-infrared (R/IR) ratios and pulse sizes in relation to the stepwise increased pressure applied to the probe. R/IR variability decreased with applied pressures between 60 and 120 mm Hg. These findings are partly attributed to a corresponding increase in red and infrared pulse sizes at the detectors, which results in an improved signal-to-noise ratio. It is thought that pressure onto the oximeter sensor forces venous blood out of the tissues underneath the sensor. Consequently, the disturbing influence of pulsating and non-pulsating venous blood is reduced. Moreover, the increased difference in vessel diameter between diastole and systole and the corresponding difference in light absorption and an increase in flow velocities, causes an increase in pulse size with increasing pressure on the probe. Pressure applied to the probe may be useful in increasing the accuracy of reflectance pulse oximetry.
Similar articles
-
Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead of newborns: the influence of varying pressure on the probe.J Clin Monit. 1996 Nov;12(6):421-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02199702. J Clin Monit. 1996. PMID: 8982906
-
Effect of location of the sensor on reflectance pulse oximetry.Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Aug;104(8):910-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb14350.x. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997. PMID: 9255082
-
Limitations of forehead pulse oximetry.J Clin Monit. 1995 Jul;11(4):253-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01617520. J Clin Monit. 1995. PMID: 7561999
-
Factors influencing fetal pulse oximetry performance.J Clin Monit Comput. 2004 Feb;18(1):13-24. doi: 10.1023/b:jocm.0000025278.82852.b3. J Clin Monit Comput. 2004. PMID: 15139579 Review.
-
Accuracy of fetal pulse oximetry and pitfalls in measurements.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Mar;72 Suppl:S21-7. doi: 10.1016/s0301-2115(97)02714-0. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997. PMID: 9134409 Review.
Cited by
-
Optical Fibre-Based Pulse Oximetry Sensor with Contact Force Detection.Sensors (Basel). 2018 Oct 26;18(11):3632. doi: 10.3390/s18113632. Sensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30373119 Free PMC article.
-
Reflectance pulse oximetry at the forehead of newborns: the influence of varying pressure on the probe.J Clin Monit. 1996 Nov;12(6):421-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02199702. J Clin Monit. 1996. PMID: 8982906
-
Evaluating Vascular Depth-Dependent Changes in Multi-Wavelength PPG Signals Due to Contact Force.Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 24;24(9):2692. doi: 10.3390/s24092692. Sensors (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38732798 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of reflectance pulse oximetry: an evaluation of a new sensor in piglets.J Clin Monit. 1997 Jan;13(1):43-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007332105965. J Clin Monit. 1997. PMID: 9058252
-
In-Ear Pulse Rate Measurement: A Valid Alternative to Heart Rate Derived from Electrocardiography?Sensors (Basel). 2019 Aug 21;19(17):3641. doi: 10.3390/s19173641. Sensors (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31438600 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources