Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays
- PMID: 7562040
Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the results of PET with 16 alpha-[18F]fluoro-17 beta-estradiol (FES) and [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) to validate the concordance between tumor estrogen-receptor (ER) status as determined by FES-PET and in vitro assays and to assess the relationship between tumor metabolic activity determined by FDG-PET and tumor ER status, both of which may provide information about tumor aggressiveness and prognosis.
Methods: We studied 32 patients with primary breast masses and 21 patients with clinical or radiological evidence of recurrent/metastatic breast carcinoma. A diagnosis of breast carcinoma was subsequently proven in 43 patients (24 primary, 15 metastatic and 4 recurrent tumors). In vitro assessment of ER status was available for 40 malignant lesions (23 primary and 17 metastatic/recurrent). The patients underwent PET with both FES and FDG, and the uptake of each tracer within each lesion was evaluated qualitatively as well as semiquantitatively using the standardized-uptake-value (SUV) method.
Results: We found good overall agreement (88%) between in vitro ER assays and FES-PET. This degree of agreement is similar to that observed between replicate in vitro assays (with discordances due to interlaboratory, interassay and specimen variability). We were, however, unable to demonstrate any significant relationship between tumor FDG uptake and ER status or between tumor FDG and tumor FES uptake in these patients.
Conclusion: These results indicate that in vitro ER assays and/or FES-PET provide unique direct information about breast cancer ER status that cannot be obtained indirectly by FDG-PET.
Similar articles
-
Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy.Clin Cancer Res. 1996 Jun;2(6):933-9. Clin Cancer Res. 1996. PMID: 9816253
-
Can fluorine-18 fluoroestradiol positron emission tomography-computed tomography demonstrate the heterogeneity of breast cancer in vivo?Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Oct;13(5):359-63. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2013.02.012. Epub 2013 Jun 17. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013. PMID: 23787040
-
Metabolic flare: indicator of hormone responsiveness in advanced breast cancer.J Clin Oncol. 2001 Jun 1;19(11):2797-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.11.2797. J Clin Oncol. 2001. PMID: 11387350 Clinical Trial.
-
Current applications of PET imaging of sex hormone receptors with a fluorinated analogue of estradiol or of testosterone.Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015 Mar;59(1):4-17. Epub 2015 Feb 19. Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015. PMID: 25693420 Review.
-
Whole-Body Characterization of Estrogen Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer with 16α-18F-Fluoro-17β-Estradiol Positron Emission Tomography: Meta-Analysis and Recommendations for Integration into Clinical Applications.Oncologist. 2020 Oct;25(10):835-844. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0967. Epub 2020 May 15. Oncologist. 2020. PMID: 32374053 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Utility of (18)F FDG-PET/CT for predicting prognosis of luminal-type breast cancer.Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Feb;150(1):209-17. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3303-9. Epub 2015 Feb 20. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015. PMID: 25697596 Free PMC article.
-
The role of positron emission tomographic imaging in breast cancer.Curr Oncol Rep. 2004 Jan;6(1):62-8. doi: 10.1007/s11912-996-0011-y. Curr Oncol Rep. 2004. PMID: 14664763 Review.
-
PACE4-based molecular targeting of prostate cancer using an engineered ⁶⁴Cu-radiolabeled peptide inhibitor.Neoplasia. 2014 Aug;16(8):634-43. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.07.010. Neoplasia. 2014. PMID: 25220591 Free PMC article.
-
18F-16α-17β-Fluoroestradiol Binding Specificity in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.Radiology. 2018 Mar;286(3):856-864. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162956. Epub 2017 Sep 25. Radiology. 2018. PMID: 28956736 Free PMC article.
-
Considering the Relationship between Quantitative Parameters and Prognostic Factors in Breast Cancer: Can Mean Standardized Uptake Value be an Alternative to Maximum Standardized Uptake Value?World J Nucl Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;16(4):275-280. doi: 10.4103/1450-1147.215485. World J Nucl Med. 2017. PMID: 29033675 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous