Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Jul;22(7):1235-40.

Comparison of phenytoin with auranofin and chloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis--a double blind study

Affiliations
  • PMID: 7562751
Clinical Trial

Comparison of phenytoin with auranofin and chloroquine in rheumatoid arthritis--a double blind study

U R Rao et al. J Rheumatol. 1995 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate efficacy of phenytoin in modifying the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) by comparing it to gold (auranofin) and chloroquine.

Methods: A double blind, randomized study of 6 months' duration was conducted at the Nizam Institute of Medical Sciences, Hyderabad, India. One hundred and thirty-two patients with active RA (defined by the 1987 ARA criteria) were entered into the study and randomized into 3 groups: phenytoin, chloroquine, or auranofin.

Results: Full data were evaluable in 100 patients who satisfactorily completed the protocol (phenytoin, 35; auranofin, 30; and chloroquine, 35). Twenty-four patients were noncompliant and did not take medication or return for evaluation; 8 patients had the drug withdrawn because of side effects before study completion. For each of the 3 drugs all clinical and laboratory variables improved when pre and posttreatment values (p < 0.05 to 0.001) were compared. There was a greater reduction in posttreatment mean morning stiffness in the chloroquine group than in the phenytoin and auranofin groups (p < 0.05). Posttreatment grip strength was also greatest in the chloroquine group. On the other hand, there were statistically significant decreases in IgM levels in both the phenytoin and auranofin groups (p < 0.001), but not with chloroquine. Among the 53 patients with a disease history of 3-6 months, global outcome was best with phenytoin (16/17), compared to chloroquine (12/18) and auranofin (12/18) (p < 0.03). However, there was no such difference in the 47 patients in all 3 groups with a disease history longer than 6 months. Eight patients had side effects (phenytoin, auranofin, 2; chloroquine, 1) requiring withdrawal of the drug. However, the incidence of side effects was not significantly different for the 3 drugs.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that phenytoin is comparable to auranofin and chloroquine in its efficacy in RA and may be considered an alternative disease modifying agent for RA.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources