This site needs JavaScript to work properly. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features!

Skip to main page content

Add to Collections

Your saved search

Name of saved search:

Search terms:

Test search terms

Would you like email updates of new search results?

Yes
No

Email: (change)

Frequency:

Which day?

Which day?

Report format:

Send at most:

Send even when there aren't any new results

Optional text in email:

Your RSS Feed

. 1995 Sep 30;346(8979):906.

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92749-2.

Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals

PMID: 7564699
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92749-2

Impact factor as a misleading tool in evaluation of medical journals

S Hansson. Lancet. 1995.

. 1995 Sep 30;346(8979):906.

doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92749-2.

Author

PMID: 7564699
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)92749-2

Erratum in

Lancet 1995 Oct 28;346(8983):1172

No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals.
Brody S. Brody S. Lancet. 1995 Nov 11;346(8985):1300-1. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)91904-x. Lancet. 1995. PMID: 7475746 No abstract available.
Impact factor as the best operational measure of medical journals.
Foster WR. Foster WR. Lancet. 1995 Nov 11;346(8985):1301. Lancet. 1995. PMID: 7475747 No abstract available.

Publication types

Actions

MeSH terms

Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions
Actions

LinkOut - more resources

Full Text Sources
- Elsevier Science
- Ovid Technologies, Inc.