Quantitative versus subjective evaluation of mammography accreditation phantom images

Abstract

The precision of quantitative and subjective evaluations of phantom image quality has been studied. Twenty-seven images of the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography accreditation phantom were acquired under different x-ray techniques and digitized. Several quantitative image quality measures were obtained from each image by analyzing microcalcification and nodule target objects in the phantom. All images were also scored subjectively by 8 observers, each of whom provided a count of the number of objects seen in each target class (fibrils, microcalcifications, and nodules). An analysis was performed to predict the subjective measurements from the quantitative measurements and to estimate their variabilities. It was found that the subjective measures could be well predicted by the quantitative measures and that the variance of the quantitative measures was significantly smaller than that of the subjective measure, by almost a factor of 10. The implication for the ACR accreditation program for mammography is that a substantial improvement is possible in the image quality evaluation process by performing computerized analysis of the phantom images in addition to subjective analysis.