Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data

Affiliations

D A Savitz et al. Am J Epidemiol. 1995.

. 1995 Nov 1;142(9):904-8.

doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117737.

¹ Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.

No abstract available

Comment in

Re: "Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data".
Manor O, Peritz E. Manor O, et al. Am J Epidemiol. 1997 Jan 1;145(1):84-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009041. Am J Epidemiol. 1997. PMID: 8982029 No abstract available.
Invited commentary: Re: "Multiple comparisons and related issues in the interpretation of epidemiologic data".
Thompson JR. Thompson JR. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 May 1;147(9):801-6. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009530. Am J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9583708 Review. No abstract available.
Multiple comparisons, explained.
Goodman SN. Goodman SN. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 May 1;147(9):807-12; discussion 815. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009531. Am J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9583709 Review. No abstract available.
Describing data requires no adjustment for multiple comparisons: a reply from Savitz and Olshan.
Savitz DA, Olshan AF. Savitz DA, et al. Am J Epidemiol. 1998 May 1;147(9):813-4; discussion 815. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009532. Am J Epidemiol. 1998. PMID: 9583710 Review. No abstract available.