Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Nov 1;92(9 Suppl):II8-13.
doi: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.8.

Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance

Affiliations

Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance

L R Dewar et al. Circulation. .

Abstract

Background: The influence of unilateral (UL) and bilateral (BL) mammary artery revascularization, within age groups < or = 60 years and > 60 years, on patient survival, ischemic-related events, and interventional management was studied in 1142 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 1984 and 1992.

Methods and results: UL revascularization was performed in 765 (67%) and BL in 377 (33%) patients with supplemental vein grafts. The overall early and hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For UL in the age group < or = 60 years, it was 1.1%; for BL < or = 60 years, 1.3% (P = NS); for UL > 60 years, 4.3%; and for BL > 60 years, 2.8% (P = NS). Twenty-five preoperative patient characteristics representing demographics, extent of disease, concomitant disease, ventricular dysfunction, previous surgery, and status did not differentiate the patient groups (P = NS). Patient survival at 5 years was not different: 94% for UL < or = 60 years, 95% for BL < or = 60 years, 91% for UL > 60 years, and 86% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from ischemic-related events was not different at 5 years (P = NS). The freedom from recurrent angina was 78% for UL < or = 60 years, 88% for BL < or = 60 years, 82% for UL > 60 years, and 83% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The myocardial infarction freedom was 98% for UL < or = 60 years, 96% for BL < or = 60 years, 99% for UL > 60 years, and 97% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from sudden unexpected death and cardiac death did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from angioplasty and reoperation did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from all ischemic-related and interventional events was 76% for UL < or = 60 years, 84% for BL < or = 60 years, 81% for UL > 60 years, and 79% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). A trend exists for less angina pectoris in the bilateral population < or = 60 years, which reflects in the trend in the freedom from overall events.

Conclusions: UL and BL mammary artery revascularizations have the same early mortality regardless of age but do not reveal any advantage for BL revascularization at 5 to 7 years.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources