Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance
- PMID: 7586466
- DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.92.9.8
Unilateral versus bilateral internal mammary revascularization. Survival and event-free performance
Abstract
Background: The influence of unilateral (UL) and bilateral (BL) mammary artery revascularization, within age groups < or = 60 years and > 60 years, on patient survival, ischemic-related events, and interventional management was studied in 1142 patients who had coronary artery bypass graft surgery between 1984 and 1992.
Methods and results: UL revascularization was performed in 765 (67%) and BL in 377 (33%) patients with supplemental vein grafts. The overall early and hospital mortality rate was 2.7%. For UL in the age group < or = 60 years, it was 1.1%; for BL < or = 60 years, 1.3% (P = NS); for UL > 60 years, 4.3%; and for BL > 60 years, 2.8% (P = NS). Twenty-five preoperative patient characteristics representing demographics, extent of disease, concomitant disease, ventricular dysfunction, previous surgery, and status did not differentiate the patient groups (P = NS). Patient survival at 5 years was not different: 94% for UL < or = 60 years, 95% for BL < or = 60 years, 91% for UL > 60 years, and 86% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from ischemic-related events was not different at 5 years (P = NS). The freedom from recurrent angina was 78% for UL < or = 60 years, 88% for BL < or = 60 years, 82% for UL > 60 years, and 83% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The myocardial infarction freedom was 98% for UL < or = 60 years, 96% for BL < or = 60 years, 99% for UL > 60 years, and 97% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). The freedom from sudden unexpected death and cardiac death did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from angioplasty and reoperation did not differentiate the groups (P = NS). The freedom from all ischemic-related and interventional events was 76% for UL < or = 60 years, 84% for BL < or = 60 years, 81% for UL > 60 years, and 79% for BL > 60 years (P = NS). A trend exists for less angina pectoris in the bilateral population < or = 60 years, which reflects in the trend in the freedom from overall events.
Conclusions: UL and BL mammary artery revascularizations have the same early mortality regardless of age but do not reveal any advantage for BL revascularization at 5 to 7 years.
Similar articles
-
Emergency re-revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention, reoperation, or conservative treatment in patients with acute perioperative graft failure following coronary artery bypass surgery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006 Jul;30(1):117-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2006.03.062. Epub 2006 May 24. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2006. PMID: 16723243
-
Single versus bilateral internal mammary artery for isolated first myocardial revascularization in multivessel disease: long-term clinical results in medically treated diabetic patients.Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):888-95. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.077. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005. PMID: 16122450
-
Long-term follow-up of total arterial myocardial revascularization using exclusively pedicle bilateral internal thoracic artery and right gastroepiploic artery.Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Dec;26(6):1141-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.08.027. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004. PMID: 15541975
-
Urgent/emergent surgical revascularization in unstable angina: influence of different type of conduits.J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):201-10. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006. PMID: 16572095
-
Recognition and treatment of ischemic heart diseases in women.Future Cardiol. 2019 May;15(3):197-225. doi: 10.2217/fca-2018-0079. Epub 2019 Jun 5. Future Cardiol. 2019. PMID: 31166119 Review.
Cited by
-
Use Rate and Outcome in Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Grafting: Insights From a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 17;7(11):e009361. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009361. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29773579 Free PMC article.
-
The Value of Inflammation Indexes in Predicting Patency of Saphenous Vein Grafts in Patients With Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.Cureus. 2021 Jul 26;13(7):e16646. doi: 10.7759/cureus.16646. eCollection 2021 Jul. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34462681 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in long-term survival outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting using single vs multiple arterial grafts: a meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data and subgroup analyses.Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023 Feb;71(2):77-89. doi: 10.1007/s11748-022-01891-7. Epub 2022 Nov 17. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2023. PMID: 36394709 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Impact of double internal thoracic artery grafts on long-term outcomes in coronary artery bypass grafting.Tex Heart Inst J. 2001;28(2):89-95. Tex Heart Inst J. 2001. PMID: 11453138 Free PMC article.
-
Unmeasured Confounders in Observational Studies Comparing Bilateral Versus Single Internal Thoracic Artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Meta-Analysis.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jan 6;7(1):e008010. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008010. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29306899 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous