Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Jul;14(4):458-63.
doi: 10.1007/BF02207682.

Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in rheumatoid arthritis: effect of methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine therapy

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Serum soluble interleukin-2 receptor levels in rheumatoid arthritis: effect of methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine therapy

F Salaffi et al. Clin Rheumatol. 1995 Jul.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the correlations of the serum soluble interleukin 2 receptor (sIL-2R) concentrations with disease activity parameters and response to treatment with second line drugs in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Sixty-seven patients with active disease completed a 24-week, open, randomized study of methotrexate (MTX) versus sulphasalazine (SSZ) or hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Serum sIL-2R levels were evaluated before entry and after 24 weeks by ELISA. Serum sIL-2R were significantly higher in RA patients than in controls (P = 0.0001) and correlated significantly only with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (P = 0.03) and with Chronic Arthritis Systemic Index (P = 0.01) at study entry. No correlation was found between serum sIL-2R and other laboratory and clinical indices of disease activity. After 24 weeks of treatment no differences in serum sIL-2R in comparison with basal levels were found in either responding or in non-responding patients, although the mean reduction of sIL-2R was more marked in the MTX-treated cohort than in the HCQ and SSZ-treated groups. These data suggest that in RA the measurement of sIL-2R should be used with caution as an isolated index of disease activity and that it is not a useful marker of response to treatment with second line drugs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Clin Immunol Immunopathol. 1990 Oct;57(1):74-82 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Feb;23(2):137-45 - PubMed
    1. Rheumatol Int. 1994;14(2):47-52 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1988 Jun;31(6):729-35 - PubMed
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Feb;36(2):199-203 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources