Transrectal needle aspiration versus transperineal needle biopsy in diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma
- PMID: 7591574
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02551315
Transrectal needle aspiration versus transperineal needle biopsy in diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma
Abstract
Fine-needle aspiration of the prostate was compared to transperineal biopsy in 86 patients with suspected prostatic carcinoma. Aspiration was found to have a sensitivity of 98.6% while no complications were seen. Initial core needle biopsy compared to the final histological diagnosis in this study showed a sensitivity of 84.5%. Fine-needle aspiration of the prostate is a safe, inexpensive and accurate diagnostic method in prostatic carcinoma. Our findings suggest that prostatic aspiration should be used more widely as an initial diagnostic procedure for suspected prostatic cancer.
Similar articles
-
Transrectal needle aspiration versus transperineal needle biopsy in diagnosis of carcinoma of prostate.Urology. 1986 May;27(5):410-4. doi: 10.1016/0090-4295(86)90404-8. Urology. 1986. PMID: 3705274
-
The cytological diagnosis of prostatic carcinoma by transrectal fine needle aspiration.J Urol. 1983 May;129(5):998-1000. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)52507-0. J Urol. 1983. PMID: 6854779
-
The role of transrectal aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis of prostatic cancer.J Urol. 1986 Feb;135(2):299-302. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)45619-9. J Urol. 1986. PMID: 3944865
-
How to Biopsy: Transperineal Versus Transrectal, Saturation Versus Targeted, What's the Evidence?Urol Clin North Am. 2017 Nov;44(4):525-534. doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.002. Urol Clin North Am. 2017. PMID: 29107269 Review.
-
The roles of fine needle aspiration and needle core biopsies in the diagnosis of primary prostatic cancer.Hum Pathol. 1992 Mar;23(3):249-57. doi: 10.1016/0046-8177(92)90105-c. Hum Pathol. 1992. PMID: 1555835 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical