Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 1978 Apr;80(2):301-13.
doi: 10.1017/s0022172400053663.

Geographical distribution of the dermatophytes: a review

Review

Geographical distribution of the dermatophytes: a review

C M Philpot. J Hyg (Lond). 1978 Apr.

Abstract

In these days of rapid transit from continent to continent, and the increasing mobility of people, agents of disease are no longer geographically restricted. Disease contracted half way across the world may become manifest in a country in which the pathogen is not normally found. Thus knowledge of the geographical distribution of pathogens becomes increasingly important when a diagnosis is being made. This is as true of ringworm fungi as of any other group of microorganisms. In the last 12 years, in the Mycological Reference Laboratory, an increasing number of exotic dermatophytes have been seen, related in part at least to the great increase in the number of non-British residents. Not all species of dermatophytes are cosmopolitan in their distribution throughout the world. While some have been recorded from every continent, others have geographically limited areas of greater or lesser extent. Surveys taken at intervals in a country may show a rise and fall in occurrence of several species as habits change, populations move and medical facilities became increasingly well-distributed. There have been few geographical surveys of ringworm fungi that have covered the world. Ajello (1960, 1974) has reviewed the individual species with regard to geographical location, while Vanbreuseghem & de Vroey (1970) attempted to estimate the relative importance of the various species in terms of numbers of isolations reported. This paper therefore reviews the world dermatophyte flora in terms of the dominant agents in the various countries, and some of the changes that have been recorded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Int J Dermatol. 1977 Apr;16(3):188-90 - PubMed
    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Mar 22;112(6):712-6 - PubMed
    1. Dermatol Monatsschr. 1975 Jun;161(6):433-49 - PubMed
    1. S Afr Med J. 1976 Apr 24;50(18):705-7 - PubMed
    1. Rev Med Chil. 1974 Apr;102(4):299-302 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources