Multistage selection for maximum economic return with an application to beef cattle breeding
- PMID: 7608002
- DOI: 10.2527/1995.733699x
Multistage selection for maximum economic return with an application to beef cattle breeding
Abstract
Methodology for selection index updating was developed to allow multistage selection. The program determines truncation points for each stage of selection that will maximize either profit or the ratio of aggregate economic gain to cost (R = delta H/C). Either maximum profit or R may be attained by reducing the cost of performance testing in later stages of a multistage program. In order to eliminate the need for multiple integration and assure convergence, a piecewise algorithm was developed. Examples of beef bull selection compared single-stage selection at 1 yr of age, two-stage selection at birth and 1 yr, two-stage selection at 205 d and 1 yr, and three-stage selection at birth, 205 d, and 1 yr. Selection based on three traits (birth weight, gain birth to 205 d, and gain 205 to 365 d) was compared with selection based on four traits (the above three plus ultrasound fat depth) and selection based on five traits (the above four plus feed:gain ratio). Five scenarios were used that allowed variation in proportion of candidates selected for breeding, number of progeny per selected bull, and proportion of profit returned to the nucleus herd. General conclusions based on the examples were 1) multistage selection reduced aggregate economic gain relative to that attained by single-stage selection, 2) inclusion of feed conversion in the index of traits resulted in reduced profit and aggregate economic gain, 3) measurement of feed conversion could be justified when selected bulls produced a large number of progeny, and 4) three-trait selection produced greater profit in all five scenarios than did four- or five-trait selection. Use of the selection updating program described here provides a new source of information that can be used in developing economically sound performance testing and selection programs.
Similar articles
-
Genetic and economic evaluation of Japanese Black (Wagyu) cattle breeding schemes.J Anim Sci. 2005 Sep;83(9):2021-32. doi: 10.2527/2005.8392021x. J Anim Sci. 2005. PMID: 16100056
-
Genomic selection for the improvement of meat quality in beef.J Anim Sci. 2012 Oct;90(10):3418-26. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-5005. Epub 2012 Jun 4. J Anim Sci. 2012. PMID: 22665643
-
Genetic change results from selection on an economic breeding objective in beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2008 Dec;86(12):3348-57. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-566. Epub 2008 May 9. J Anim Sci. 2008. PMID: 18469047
-
The nature, scope and impact of genomic prediction in beef cattle in the United States.Genet Sel Evol. 2011 May 15;43(1):17. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-17. Genet Sel Evol. 2011. PMID: 21569623 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Shortcomings of current genetic evaluation systems.J Anim Sci. 1998 Sep;76(9):2308-23. doi: 10.2527/1998.7692308x. J Anim Sci. 1998. PMID: 9781487 Review.
Cited by
-
Avoiding preselection bias in subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluations of genomically preselected animals.J Anim Breed Genet. 2021 Jul;138(4):432-441. doi: 10.1111/jbg.12533. Epub 2020 Dec 29. J Anim Breed Genet. 2021. PMID: 33372707 Free PMC article.
-
Combined Multistage Linear Genomic Selection Indices To Predict the Net Genetic Merit in Plant Breeding.G3 (Bethesda). 2020 Jun 1;10(6):2087-2101. doi: 10.1534/g3.120.401171. G3 (Bethesda). 2020. PMID: 32312840 Free PMC article.
-
Optimising multistage dairy cattle breeding schemes including genomic selection using decorrelated or optimum selection indices.Genet Sel Evol. 2012 Jan 17;44(1):1. doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-44-1. Genet Sel Evol. 2012. PMID: 22252172 Free PMC article.
-
Investigating the impact of preselection on subsequent single-step genomic BLUP evaluation of preselected animals.Genet Sel Evol. 2020 Jul 29;52(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12711-020-00562-6. Genet Sel Evol. 2020. PMID: 32727349 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources