Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 May;166(5):650-3.
doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.5.650.

A self-rating scale for measuring neuroleptic side-effects. Validation in a group of schizophrenic patients

Affiliations

A self-rating scale for measuring neuroleptic side-effects. Validation in a group of schizophrenic patients

J C Day et al. Br J Psychiatry. 1995 May.

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to validate a comprehensive self-rating scale for measuring side-effects of neuroleptic drugs.

Method: The Liverpool University Neuroleptic Side Effect Rating Scale (LUNSERS), which includes 'red herring' items, was twice administered to 50 DSM-III-R schizophrenic patients, who were also interviewed using the UKU side-effect rating scale; 50 unmedicated controls also completed the LUNSERS:

Results: The test-retest reliability of the LUNSERS was good (r = 0.811, P < 0.001) as was its concurrent validity against the UKU (r = 0.828, P < 0.001). Scores correlated with chlorpromazine equivalent doses (r = 0.310, P < 0.02). ROC analysis demonstrated that the scale discriminated between patients and non-medicated controls, who scored differently for real side-effects but not for 'red herring' items.

Conclusions: The LUNSERS is an efficient, reliable and valid method of assessing neuroleptic side-effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Publication types

Substances