Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 May;9(4):421-5.
doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(05)80010-3.

Effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with inoperable severe lower limb ischaemia: a prospective randomised controlled study

Affiliations
Free article
Clinical Trial

Effects of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) in patients with inoperable severe lower limb ischaemia: a prospective randomised controlled study

L E Jivegård et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1995 May.
Free article

Abstract

Objectives: This study was designed to test the hypothesis that spinal cord stimulation (SCS) improves limb salvage in patients with inoperable severe leg ischaemia.

Design: Prospective randomised controlled study with 18 months follow-up.

Setting: Vascular surgical units in two university hospitals.

Materials: Atherosclerotic (n = 41) and diabetic (n = 10) patients having chronic leg ischaemia with rest pain and/or ischaemic ulcerations due to technically inoperable arterial occlusions.

Chief outcome measures: Limb salvage and amount of tissue loss within 18 months, pain relief.

Main results: Twenty-five patients were randomized to SCS and 26 to analgesic (control) treatment. Macrocirculatory parameters were not different in the two groups during follow-up. Long-term pain relief was observed only in the SCS group. At 18 months, limb salvage rates in the SCS and control groups were 62% and 45% (N.S.). Tissue loss was less (p = 0.05) in the SCS group. A subgroup analysis of patients without arterial hypertension showed a significantly lower amputation rate in the SCS vs the control group.

Conclusions: SCS provided long-term pain relief but limb salvage at 18 months was not significantly improved by SCS in this rather small study. The results suggest that SCS may reduce amputation levels in patients with severe inoperable leg ischaemia and be most effective in patients without arterial hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Spinal cord stimulation.
    Claeys L. Claeys L. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996 Nov;12(4):512-3. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80034-7. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996. PMID: 8980454 No abstract available.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources