Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 May-Jun;19(3):372-7; discussion 377-8.
doi: 10.1007/BF00299161.

Diagnostic outcome of repeated mammography screening

Affiliations

Diagnostic outcome of repeated mammography screening

L G Arnesson et al. World J Surg. 1995 May-Jun.

Abstract

Mammographic screening for breast cancer within health service routines was evaluated for the years 1987-1992, with special focus on repeated screening during 1989-1992. The overall attendance rate by women aged 40 to 74 years was 82.8%. During 1989-1992 malignancy was found in 2.6/1000 screened women, giving a 87.4% positive predictive rate at surgery and 95.9% efficiency. Among women aged > or = 45 years, the positive predictive rate was > 94%. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy showed invasive cancers in 84% and highly suspected cancer in another 15%; 60% of the lesions were nonpalpable. For first-time (prevalence) screening (1987-1988) the positive predictive rate was 86% and the malignancy yield 6.4/1000. In women aged 40-44 years there were few surgical referrals (1.6%), but the positive predictive rate at surgery was only 48.3%, indicating diagnostic difficulties in young women. The median size of all invasive cancers was 12 mm: 84% were classified as pT1, and 23% had lymph node involvement. Stage II disease was found in 27% of all malignancies. The use of FNA in the diagnostic workup for breast cancer screening is of crucial importance to the maintenance of high positive predictive rates at surgery. Moreover, regular analysis is important even when mammographic screening is incorporated into the routine work of health services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Radiol Med. 1991 Jul-Aug;82(1-2):56-9 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1989 May 13;1(8646):1033-6 - PubMed
    1. Acta Radiol Oncol. 1985 Nov-Dec;24(6):465-73 - PubMed
    1. Br J Cancer. 1987 Nov;56(5):667-71 - PubMed
    1. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987 Dec;165(6):523-9 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources