Operational issues in syringe exchanges: the New York City tagging alternative study
- PMID: 7642778
- DOI: 10.1007/BF02260333
Operational issues in syringe exchanges: the New York City tagging alternative study
Abstract
It is estimated that 50% of the approximate 200,000 intravenous drug users (IDUs) in New York City (NYC) are infected with HIV. Syringe exchange, a common method of HIV prevention in many countries was legalized in NYC in 1992. As syringe exchange has gained public support and the number of functioning exchangers has grown in the country, more attention has been given to the study of operational characteristics of syringe exchanges. Syringe exchanges may be considered health service delivery organizations, and the specific methods of service delivery may greatly influence their effectiveness in reducing HIV risk behavior among injecting drug users. Improving operational characteristics of syringe exchanges requires both careful data collection, in order to reduce ambiguity in interpretation, and methods for cumulating knowledge, so that previous learning experiences need not be repeated with each new exchange. We report here on the practice of marking ("tagging") syringes distributed by exchanges in NYC during the period from 1990 through 1994. During this period the NYC exchanges operated illegally as underground exchanges, and then received legal status and expanded greatly. Developing regulations that reflect the reality of the program operations while allowing for monitoring and oversight is a complicated process, especially when implemented in states that maintain paraphernalia and prescription laws and where "unauthorized" possession of injection equipment remains a criminal activity under existing legal statutes. The particular situation in NYC which required the revision of existing regulations during a period of rapid program expansion and implementation of a large system of syringe exchange further illustrates the multiple pressures which accompany such a process. In order to implement meaningful regulations which maximize the public health benefits of syringe exchange programs on an individual and community level, recommendations are made.
Similar articles
-
Operating needle exchange programmes in the hills of Thailand.AIDS Care. 1995;7(4):489-99. doi: 10.1080/09540129550126434. AIDS Care. 1995. PMID: 8547363
-
HIV incidence among injecting drug users in New York City syringe-exchange programmes.Lancet. 1996 Oct 12;348(9033):987-91. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)02536-6. Lancet. 1996. PMID: 8855855
-
[Evaluation of a pilot study on needle and syringe exchange program among injecting drug users in a community in Guangdong, China].Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004 Sep;38(5):305-8. Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2004. PMID: 15498241 Chinese.
-
Integrating multiple programme and policy approaches to hepatitis C prevention and care for injection drug users: a comprehensive approach.Int J Drug Policy. 2007 Oct;18(5):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Feb 20. Int J Drug Policy. 2007. PMID: 17854731 Review.
-
Syringe exchange in Canada: good but not enough to stem the HIV tide.Subst Use Misuse. 1998 Apr;33(5):1129-46. doi: 10.3109/10826089809062211. Subst Use Misuse. 1998. PMID: 9596380 Review.
Cited by
-
Regulating controversial programs for unpopular people: methadone maintenance and syringe exchange programs.Am J Public Health. 1995 Nov;85(11):1577-84. doi: 10.2105/ajph.85.11.1577. Am J Public Health. 1995. PMID: 7485676 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Return Rates for Needle Exchange Programs: A Common Criticism Answered.Harm Reduct J. 2004 Apr 19;1(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-1-2. Harm Reduct J. 2004. PMID: 15169545 Free PMC article.
-
Impact of a medically supervised safer injecting facility on drug dealing and other drug-related crime.Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006 May 8;1:13. doi: 10.1186/1747-597X-1-13. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2006. PMID: 16722550 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical
Research Materials