Utilization and outcomes of surgical gastrostomies and jejunostomies in an era of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a population-based study
- PMID: 7643635
Utilization and outcomes of surgical gastrostomies and jejunostomies in an era of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a population-based study
Abstract
Objective: To determine the indications for use of surgical gastrostomy (SG) and surgical jejunostomy (SJ) as feeding tubes, the complications, and the trends in the use of SG and SJ after the introduction of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) at our institution in 1981.
Design: We conducted a retrospective, population-based cohort study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, who received surgically placed feeding tubes between 1976 and 1989.
Material and methods: The medical records of all Olmsted County residents with surgical placement of a feeding tube during the designated study period were reviewed, and underlying conditions, complications, and survival were analyzed.
Results: Of 77 adult patients (mean age, 66 years; 48% women), 54 underwent SG and 23 had SJ. General anesthesia was used in 42 patients (55%). The indications for SG or SJ were stroke in 23 patients, cancer in 19, other central nervous system-related conditions in 16, and other conditions in 19. Among the numerous comorbid conditions, pulmonary disease (N = 44) and cardiac disease (N = 32) were most frequent. The median duration of follow-up was 181 days. Complications occurred in 31 of 54 patients (57%) with SG and in 13 of 23 (57%) with SJ. Of the 117 complications, 15% were considered major. Twenty patients (26%) resumed eating. Survival at 1, 6, and 12 months was 79%, 49% and 36%, respectively. Most deaths were due to the disease for which the feeding tube had been placed. In a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, only age and hypoxemia were found to be significantly associated with survival. Hypoxemia, type of tube, central nervous system disease as indication for procedure, and previous aspiration were associated with failure to resume eating (P < 0.05). Survival was similar to that for our patients with PEG during the same period. The overall incidence of feeding tube placement increased throughout the study period.
Conclusion: Patients who require enteral feeding tubes have multiple comorbid conditions that have a major influence on the outcome. The overall incidence of feeding tube placement increased after the introduction of PEG. In patients who require long-term enteral nutrition and are unable to have a feeding tube placed percutaneously, surgically placed feeding tubes have outcomes similar to those reported for patients with PEG.
Comment in
-
Surgical gastrostomies versus endoscopic gastrostomies: a tube by any other name..Mayo Clin Proc. 1995 Sep;70(9):914-6. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)63951-7. Mayo Clin Proc. 1995. PMID: 7643647 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of laparoscopic jejunostomy tube to percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube with jejunal extension: long-term durability and nutritional outcomes.Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2496-2504. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5954-6. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Surg Endosc. 2018. PMID: 29218657
-
Computed Tomography-Guided Percutaneous Gastrostomy/Jejunostomy for Feeding and Decompression.Nutr Clin Pract. 2017 Apr;32(2):212-218. doi: 10.1177/0884533616653806. Epub 2016 Jul 9. Nutr Clin Pract. 2017. PMID: 27329861
-
Optimal enteral feeding in children with gastric dysfunction: surgical jejunostomy vs image-guided gastrojejunal tube placement.J Pediatr Surg. 2006 Oct;41(10):1679-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.05.050. J Pediatr Surg. 2006. PMID: 17011268
-
Percutaneous endoscopic stomas for enteral feeding and drainage.Oncology (Williston Park). 1995 Jan;9(1):39-44; discussion 44, 47. Oncology (Williston Park). 1995. PMID: 7718440 Review.
-
Enteral Access and Associated Complications.Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018 Mar;47(1):23-37. doi: 10.1016/j.gtc.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Dec 7. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2018. PMID: 29413015 Review.
Cited by
-
Postoperative jejunal feeding and outcome of pancreaticoduodenectomy.J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 May-Jun;8(4):428-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2004.01.007. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004. PMID: 15120367
-
Complication rate lower after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy than after surgical gastrostomy: a prospective, randomized trial.Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1248-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0757-6. Epub 2006 Jul 24. Surg Endosc. 2006. PMID: 16865614 Clinical Trial.
-
Comparison of laparoscopic versus open approach to gastrostomy tubes.JSLS. 2014 Jan-Mar;18(1):28-33. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13693422520927. JSLS. 2014. PMID: 24680139 Free PMC article.
-
The author replies.Surg Endosc. 1999 Jul;13(7):730-1. doi: 10.1007/s004649901086. Surg Endosc. 1999. PMID: 10384088 No abstract available.
-
Surgical feeding gastrostomy: are we overdoing it?J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 Mar-Apr;3(2):152-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(99)80025-0. J Gastrointest Surg. 1999. PMID: 10457338
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources