[Structured abstracting of scientific medical publications]
- PMID: 7644674
[Structured abstracting of scientific medical publications]
Abstract
Abstracts play an important role in medical literature as the carriers of synthetic information. Their significance grows as computerized data bases are in use in which whole information should comprise no more than 250 words. Critical appraisal the abstracts' standard resulted in a proposal for data presentation divided into significant parts (structured abstracts). The abstract of an original clinical trial should contain description of the objective, design, setting, patients, intervention, main outcome measures, results and conclusions. The abstract of the review article should provide information about the purpose, data identification, study selection, data extraction, results of data synthesis and conclusions. This form obliges the authors to precise, logical formulation draws out the essential aspects of the work, facilitates literature review, and critical appraisal.
Similar articles
-
[Abstract quality assessment of articles from the Annales de Dermatologie].Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002 Nov;129(11):1271-5. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2002. PMID: 12514515 French.
-
[The structured summary: a tool for reader and author].Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990 Dec 1;134(48):2338-43. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1990. PMID: 2255376 Dutch.
-
Quality of abstracts in 3 clinical dermatology journals.Arch Dermatol. 2003 May;139(5):589-93. doi: 10.1001/archderm.139.5.589. Arch Dermatol. 2003. PMID: 12756095
-
More informative abstracts revisited.Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996 Jan;33(1):1-9. doi: 10.1597/1545-1569-33.1.1. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1996. PMID: 8849853 Review.
-
The quality of reporting of trial abstracts is suboptimal: survey of major general medical journals.J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Apr;62(4):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.05.013. Epub 2008 Nov 17. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 19010643 Review.