Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour
- PMID: 7647645
- PMCID: PMC2550546
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7003.486
Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour
Abstract
Objectives: To determine prevalence of rectal bleeding in the community and to examine factors that lead some patients to consult their general practitioner about rectal bleeding while others do not.
Design: Questionnaire survey followed by semistructured interviews of sample of respondents with rectal bleeding.
Setting: Two general practices on Tyneside.
Subjects: 2000 adult patients registered with the general practices were sent a validated questionnaire. Respondents with rectal bleeding were divided into consulters and non-consulters, and 30 patients from each group (matched for age, sex, and characteristics of bleeding) were interviewed.
Main outcome measures: Prevalence of rectal bleeding, proportion of subjects with rectal bleeding who sought medical advice, and reasons for consulting or not consulting a doctor about rectal bleeding.
Results: 287 of the 1200 respondents to the questionnaire had noticed rectal bleeding at some time in their lives, and 231 had noticed it within previous 12 months. Only 118 (41%) of all respondents with rectal bleeding had ever sought medical advice for the problem. Those aged over 60 were most likely to have consulted, as were those who reported blood mixed with their stools. Main difference between those who had sought medical advice and those who had not was that consulters were more likely than non-consulters to perceive their symptoms as serious.
Conclusions: Although rectal bleeding is common, only minority of patients seek medical of symptoms seems to be most important factor in deciding whether to consult a doctor for rectal bleeding.
Similar articles
-
Rectal bleeding in general practice patients.Aust Fam Physician. 1999 Jul;28(7):750-4. Aust Fam Physician. 1999. PMID: 10431442
-
Delay in consulting a medical practitioner about rectal bleeding.J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Jun;46(3):241-4. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.3.241. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992. PMID: 1645079 Free PMC article.
-
Rectal bleeding: epidemiology, associated risk factors, and health care seeking behaviour: a population-based study.Colorectal Dis. 2009 Nov;11(9):921-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2008.01721.x. Epub 2008 Oct 21. Colorectal Dis. 2009. PMID: 19175652
-
The management of rectal bleeding.Br J Clin Pract. 1993 May-Jun;47(3):155-8. Br J Clin Pract. 1993. PMID: 8347443 Review.
-
Why do people consult the doctor?Fam Pract. 1996 Feb;13(1):75-83. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.1.75. Fam Pract. 1996. PMID: 8671107 Review.
Cited by
-
Detection of colorectal cancer in symptomatic outpatients without visible rectal bleeding: Validity of the fecal occult blood test.Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Aug 9;1:119-24. doi: 10.2147/clep.s7097. Clin Epidemiol. 2009. PMID: 20865093 Free PMC article.
-
Identifying and managing patients at low risk of bowel cancer in general practice.BMJ. 2003 Aug 2;327(7409):263-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7409.263. BMJ. 2003. PMID: 12896939 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Rectal and postmenopausal bleeding: consultation and referral of patients with and without severe mental health problems.Br J Gen Pract. 2007 May;57(538):371-6. Br J Gen Pract. 2007. PMID: 17504587 Free PMC article.
-
Canadian consensus on medically acceptable wait times for digestive health care.Can J Gastroenterol. 2006 Jun;20(6):411-23. doi: 10.1155/2006/343686. Can J Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16779459 Free PMC article.
-
Management of colorectal cancer.Qual Health Care. 1998 Jun;7(2):103-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.2.103. Qual Health Care. 1998. PMID: 10180789 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical