Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Sep;86(3):441-5.
doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00164-M.

Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Comparison of the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate tracings

G Giannina et al. Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the effects of meperidine and nalbuphine on intrapartum fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings using computer analysis.

Methods: We studied 28 women with uncomplicated pregnancies in early labor at term with reactive FHR tracings. The women were randomized to receive either meperidine 50 mg or nalbuphine 10 mg intravenously on request. One-hour FHR recordings were obtained before and immediately after administration of the medications.

Results: There were no significant differences in the FHR characteristics of the two groups during the pre-treatment period. Nalbuphine significantly decreased the number of accelerations of 10 beats per minute (17 versus 4, P = .003) and 15 beats per minute (10 versus 1.5, P = .001), time spent in episodes of high variation (35.5 versus 10 minutes, P = .004), long-term variation (47 versus 29.8 milliseconds, P = .002), and short-term variation (8.4 versus 6.4 milliseconds, P = .03). Meperidine had no significant effect on any FHR characteristic.

Conclusion: In the early intrapartum period of normal term pregnancies and at commonly used dosages, nalbuphine had a significant effect on FHR tracings, whereas meperidine had no effect, as determined by computer analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in