[Misoprostol--a PGE1 analog for induction of labor at term: comparative and randomized study with oxytocin]

Abstract

The efficacy of misoprostol (a PGE1 analog) for induction of labor at term was compared with oxytocin by means of an open and randomized study in 153 pregnant women. A vaginal tablet containing 50 mcg of misoprostol was placed intravaginally in 78 women, the remaining 75 patients received i.v. oxytocin (2-32 mU/min). Bishop's score at the entry of the trial was similar in both groups. Delivery within 24 hours was achieved in 85.7% of the patients induced with misoprostol and in 64% of the patients infused with oxytocin (p < 0.05). Mean induction to delivery interval was significantly shorter in the misoprostol group (552 +/- 211 min; mean =SD) in comparison with that of the oxytocin group (745 +/- 292 min; mean +/- SD) (p < 0.05). The probability of still being pregnant at 24 hours (Life table analysis) was 14% (misoprostol group) and 26% (oxitocyn group). The difference was also statistically significant (p < 0.01). No undesirable side effects were observed in any of the patients, however, polisystoly (> 5 contractions in 10 min) was more frequently observed in the patients induced with misoprostol (24.6% vs 13.3%; p = NS). Cesarean section rate was higher in the oxytocin-induced patients (25.3%) than in the misoprostol-induced women (3.8%) (p < 0.05). The main cause of cesarean section was failure to progress in labor in both groups of patients. Neonatal outcome was good in both groups and there were no differences with respect to birthweight or to Apgar scores.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)