Reconsidering the necessity of ipsilateral adrenalectomy during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

Abstract

Objectives: Ipsilateral adrenalectomy is traditionally advocated as part of radical nephrectomy performed for renal cell carcinoma. The current study addresses the controversy of whether ipsilateral adrenalectomy should be performed routinely during radical nephrectomy.

Methods: A total of 225 patients were treated surgically for renal cell carcinoma over an 18-year period. Of these patients, 158 underwent nephrectomy and simultaneous ipsilateral adrenalectomy and the other 67 had sparing of the ipsilateral adrenal gland. A retrospective analysis of the medical records and assessment of the clinical and the pathologic data were performed. Rates of survival and progression were evaluated in a subgroup of 109 patients, further subdivided into 54 patients who underwent concomitant adrenalectomy and 55 patients with the ipsilateral adrenal preserved during surgery.

Results: Histopathologic abnormalities were detected in seven adrenal specimens (4.4%); however, only 3 patients (1.9%) had involvement of the adrenal by renal cell carcinoma. All cases of adrenal involvement were detected by the preoperative imaging modalities. Ipsilateral adrenalectomy did not improve the outcome in comparison to adrenal preservation.

Conclusions: In view of the rarity of ipsilateral adrenal metastasis, the questionable prognostic merits of concomitant adrenalectomy, and the availability of accurate imaging modalities, we conclude that ipsilateral adrenalectomy is not necessary in the majority of the patients undergoing radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.