Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation
- PMID: 7661142
- DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(95)70019-6
Debonding orthodontic ceramic brackets by ultrasonic instrumentation
Abstract
Breakage of ceramic brackets because of brittleness may cause such problems as aspiration of fragments and injury by flying debris. Portions remaining on the tooth must be laboriously ground off with a handpiece. This study investigated a potential method of lowering the force required to remove ceramic brackets, i.e., use of an ultrasonic chisel. Ceramic brackets were bonded to extracted incisors and canines. The degree of cure of a light-activated cement was systematically varied with different exposure times to a curing light. The brackets were sheared from the teeth with a universal testing machine and a chisel tip on a Cavitron. The ultrasonic chisel markedly reduced the force required to debond the brackets; however, the time of application averaged 16.6 seconds. Reducing the degree of cure of the cement had only a slight effect on the time required and the forces generated. This method of debonding is not recommended without further development.
Similar articles
-
Electrothermal debonding of ceramic brackets: an ex vivo study.Br J Orthod. 1997 Aug;24(3):237-42. doi: 10.1093/ortho/24.3.237. Br J Orthod. 1997. PMID: 9313918
-
Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a resin-reinforced glass ionomer cement: an in vitro and in vivo study.Angle Orthod. 1999 Oct;69(5):463-9. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0463:COBDFB>2.3.CO;2. Angle Orthod. 1999. PMID: 10515145 Clinical Trial.
-
The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparative study.Eur J Orthod. 2000 Jun;22(3):327-34. doi: 10.1093/ejo/22.3.327. Eur J Orthod. 2000. PMID: 10920565
-
Laser debonding of ceramic brackets: a comprehensive review.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Jan;123(1):79-83. doi: 10.1067/mod.2003.2. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003. PMID: 12532067 Review.
-
Ceramic brackets and the need to develop national standards.Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 May;117(5):595-7. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70212-5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000. PMID: 10799127 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
What is the best method for debonding metallic brackets from the patient's perspective?Prog Orthod. 2015;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0088-7. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Prog Orthod. 2015. PMID: 26081783 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safe Debonding of Fixed Appliances: A Comparison of Traditional Techniques and LODI Devices on Different Bracket Types in Terms of Enamel Cracks, Site of Bond Failure, and Bracket Reusability.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 29;18(19):10267. doi: 10.3390/ijerph181910267. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021. PMID: 34639565 Free PMC article.
-
Survey on awareness and preference of ceramic bracket debonding techniques among orthodontists.J Clin Exp Dent. 2020 Jul 1;12(7):e656-e662. doi: 10.4317/jced.56976. eCollection 2020 Jul. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020. PMID: 32904974 Free PMC article.
-
Optical coherence tomography assessment of the enamel surface after debonding the ceramic brackets using three different techniques.J Orthod Sci. 2022 May 4;11:16. doi: 10.4103/jos.jos_192_21. eCollection 2022. J Orthod Sci. 2022. PMID: 35754420 Free PMC article.
-
Shear bond strength and enamel fracture behavior of ceramic brackets Fascination® and Fascination®2.J Orofac Orthop. 2012 Jan;73(1):49-57. doi: 10.1007/s00056-011-0059-7. Epub 2012 Jan 15. J Orofac Orthop. 2012. PMID: 22246049
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources