Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks
- PMID: 7661655
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01541855
Sexual orientation and performance on sexually dimorphic motor tasks
Abstract
Performance of homosexual and heterosexual men and women on two motor tasks which reliably demonstrate sex differences in opposite directions was examined. A Throw-to-Target Task and the Purdue Pegboard were administered to undergraduate students matched for age and program of study. A two-way ANOVA (Sex x Sexual Orientation) of the Throw data showed a significant interaction, F(1, 90) = 16.22, p < or = 0.001, and a trend for an effect of sex, F(1, 90) = 3.72, p < 0.06. Heterosexual men outperformed heterosexual women, whereas gay men threw less accurately and lesbians tended to throw more accurately than their heterosexual counterparts. Differences in sports history or hand strength did not account for these effects. Analysis of the Pegboard scores found no interaction or main effect of sexual orientation, but the effect of sex was significant, F(1,63) = 7.01, p < or = 0.02. Regardless of sexual orientation, women outperformed men and this difference remained significant even when a measure of finger size was partialed out. This study provides new evidence suggesting an association between sexual orientation and motor-performance profiles. As with cognitive tasks, the motor-performance profiles of homosexuals are composites of some male-typical and some female-typical abilities. To the extent that sociological factors have been controlled, the study suggests that both sexual orientation and motor/cognitive predispositions may have early biological contributions.
Similar articles
-
Sexual orientation differences in cerebral asymmetry and in the performance of sexually dimorphic cognitive and motor tasks.Arch Sex Behav. 1997 Oct;26(5):463-80. doi: 10.1023/a:1024551704723. Arch Sex Behav. 1997. PMID: 9343633
-
Sexual-orientation-related differences in verbal fluency.Neuropsychology. 2003 Apr;17(2):240-6. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.17.2.240. Neuropsychology. 2003. PMID: 12803429 Clinical Trial.
-
Sexual Orientation and Cognitive Ability: A Multivariate Meta-Analytic Follow-Up.Arch Sex Behav. 2020 Feb;49(2):413-420. doi: 10.1007/s10508-020-01632-y. Epub 2020 Jan 23. Arch Sex Behav. 2020. PMID: 31975035 Free PMC article.
-
Sexual orientation and neurocognitive ability: A meta-analysis in men and women.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017 Dec;83:691-696. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.06.014. Epub 2017 Jul 8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017. PMID: 28698022 Review.
-
Brain research, gender and sexual orientation.J Homosex. 1995;28(3-4):283-301. doi: 10.1300/J082v28n03_07. J Homosex. 1995. PMID: 7560933 Review.
Cited by
-
Is homosexuality a paraphilia? The evidence for and against.Arch Sex Behav. 2012 Feb;41(1):237-47. doi: 10.1007/s10508-012-9900-3. Arch Sex Behav. 2012. PMID: 22282324 Free PMC article.
-
Sex-related differences in motor learning and performance.Behav Brain Funct. 2010 Dec 23;6(1):74. doi: 10.1186/1744-9081-6-74. Behav Brain Funct. 2010. PMID: 21182785 Free PMC article.
-
Sex differences in visuospatial cognition- a female advantage in jigsaw puzzle solving.Exp Brain Res. 2024 Aug;242(8):1821-1830. doi: 10.1007/s00221-024-06845-4. Epub 2024 May 20. Exp Brain Res. 2024. PMID: 38847865
-
The genetics of sex differences in brain and behavior.Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011 Apr;32(2):227-46. doi: 10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.10.001. Epub 2010 Oct 15. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2011. PMID: 20951723 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Men and women differ in the neural basis of handwriting.Hum Brain Mapp. 2020 Jul;41(10):2642-2655. doi: 10.1002/hbm.24968. Epub 2020 Feb 24. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020. PMID: 32090433 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Research Materials