Similar articles

• Resin ionomer restorative materials: the new generation.

  Burgess J, Norling B, Summitt J. Burgess J, et al. J Esthet Dent. 1994;6(5):207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.1994.tb00861.x. J Esthet Dent. 1994. PMID: 8593217 Review. No abstract available.
• Moisture susceptibility of resin-modified glass-ionomer materials.

  Sidhu SK, Watson TF, Anstice HM, Billington RW, Pearson GJ. Sidhu SK, et al. Quintessence Int. 1995 Nov;26(11):753-4. Quintessence Int. 1995. PMID: 8628833 No abstract available.
• In vitro wear rates of materials under different loads and varying pH.

  Shabanian M, Richards LC. Shabanian M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Jun;87(6):650-6. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.125609. J Prosthet Dent. 2002. PMID: 12131888 Clinical Trial.
• Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.

  Toledano M, Osorio E, Osorio R, García-Godoy F. Toledano M, et al. J Prosthet Dent. 1999 May;81(5):610-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(99)70217-9. J Prosthet Dent. 1999. PMID: 10220667 Clinical Trial.
• Resin-modified glass ionomer materials. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry.

  Sidhu SK, Watson TF. Sidhu SK, et al. Am J Dent. 1995 Feb;8(1):59-67. Am J Dent. 1995. PMID: 7546477 Review.