Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1995 Sep 2;311(7005):594-7.
doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7005.594.

Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Multicentre trial to introduce the Ottawa ankle rules for use of radiography in acute ankle injuries. Multicentre Ankle Rule Study Group

I Stiell et al. BMJ. .

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility and impact of introducing the Ottawa ankle rules to a large number of physicians in a wide variety of hospital and community settings over a prolonged period of time.

Design: Multicentre before and after controlled clinical trial.

Setting: Emergency departments of eight teaching and community hospitals in Canadian communities (population 10,000 to 3,000,000).

Subjects: All 12,777 adults (6288 control, 6489 intervention) seen with acute ankle injuries during two 12 month periods before and after the intervention.

Intervention: More than 200 physicians of varying experience were taught to order radiography according to the Ottawa ankle rules.

Main outcome measures: Referral for ankle and foot radiography.

Results: There were significant reductions in use of ankle radiography at all eight hospitals and within a priori subgroups: for all hospitals combined 82.8% control v 60.9% intervention(P < 0.001); for community hospitals 86.7% v 61.7%; (P < 0.001); for teaching hospitals 77.9% v 59.9%; (P < 0.001); for emergency physicians 82.1% v 61.6%; (P < 0.001); for family physicians 84.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001); and for housestaff 82.3% v 60.1%; (P < 0.001). Compared with patients without fracture who had radiography during the intervention period those who had no radiography spent less time in the emergency department (54.0 v 86.9 minutes; P < 0.001) and had lower medical charges ($70.20 v $161.60; P < 0.001). There was no difference in the rate of fractures diagnosed after discharge from the emergency department (0.5 v 0.4%).

Conclusions: Introduction of the Ottawa ankle rules proved to be feasible in a large variety of hospital and community settings. Use of the rules over a prolonged period of time by many physicians of varying experience led to a decrease in ankle radiography, waiting times, and costs without an increased rate of missed fractures. The multiphase methodological approach used to develop and implement these rules may be applied to other clinical problems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Injury. 1974 Feb;5(3):213-4 - PubMed
    1. Adv Data. 1994 Mar 2;(245):1-12 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Feb 21;282(6264):607-8 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 1982 Feb 11;306(6):333-9 - PubMed
    1. Injury. 1983 May;14(6):507-12 - PubMed

Publication types