Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1995;130(1):3-9.
doi: 10.1007/BF01104343.

In vitro susceptibilities of clinical yeast isolates to three antifungal agents determined by the microdilution method

Affiliations
Comparative Study

In vitro susceptibilities of clinical yeast isolates to three antifungal agents determined by the microdilution method

M A Pfaller et al. Mycopathologia. 1995.

Abstract

A comparative evaluation of the in vitro susceptibilities of 597 clinical yeast isolates to amphotericin B, fluconazole, and 5-fluorocytosine (5FC) was conducted. The broth macrodilution reference method of the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS, M27-P) was adapted to the microdilution method. Microdilution endpoints for amphotericin B were scored as the lowest concentration in which a score of 0 (complete absence of growth) was observed and for 5FC and fluconazole as the lowest concentration in which a score of 2 (prominent decrease in turbidity; MIC-2) was observed compared to the growth control. The MIC values were read after 24 and 48 h incubation. A broad range of MIC values was observed with each antifungal agent. Amphotericin B was very active (MIC90 < or = 1.0 microgram/ml) against all of the yeast isolates with the exception of C. lusitaniae (MIC90 > or = 2.0 micrograms/ml). Fluconazole was most active against C. parapsilosis (MIC90 of 1.0 microgram/ml) and least active against C. krusei (MIC90 of 32 micrograms/ml). 5FC was most active against C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and T. glabrata (MIC90 < or = 1.0 microgram/ml) and was least active against C. krusei and C. lusitaniae (MIC90 > or = 16 micrograms/ml). These data indicate that the microdilution method, performed in accordance with M27-P, provides a means of testing larger numbers of yeast isolates against an array of antifungal agents and allows this to be accomplished in a reproducible and standardized manner. Given these results, it appears that the microdilution method may be a useful alternative to the macrodilution reference method for susceptibility testing of yeasts.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Sep;36(9):1805-9 - PubMed
    1. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993 Sep;37(9):1962-5 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1994 Feb;32(2):506-9 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Microbiol. 1992 Dec;30(12):3138-45 - PubMed
    1. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 Feb;15(2):145-50 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources