Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies
- PMID: 7667557
- DOI: 10.1002/sim.4780141102
Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies
Abstract
The Continual Reassessment Method (CRM) is a Bayesian phase I design whose purpose is to estimate the maximum tolerated dose of a drug that will be used in subsequent phase II and III studies. Its acceptance has been hindered by the greater duration of CRM designs compared to standard methods, as well as by concerns with excessive experimentation at high dosage levels, and with more frequent and severe toxicity. This paper presents the results of a simulation study in which one assigns more than one subject at a time to each dose level, and each dose increase is limited to one level. We show that these modifications address all of the most serious criticisms of the CRM, reducing the duration of the trial by 50-67 per cent, reducing toxicity incidence by 20-35 per cent, and lowering toxicity severity. These are achieved with minimal effects on accuracy. Most important, based on our experience at our institution, such modifications make the CRM acceptable to clinical investigators.
Similar articles
-
The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.Clin Trials. 2006;3(1):57-71. doi: 10.1191/1740774506cn134oa. Clin Trials. 2006. PMID: 16539090
-
The continual reassessment method in cancer phase I clinical trials: a simulation study.Stat Med. 1993 Jun 30;12(12):1093-108. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780121201. Stat Med. 1993. PMID: 8210815
-
Designing dose-escalation trials with late-onset toxicities using the time-to-event continual reassessment method.J Clin Oncol. 2006 Sep 20;24(27):4426-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.3844. J Clin Oncol. 2006. PMID: 16983110
-
[Continual reassessment method (CRM)].Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000 Aug;27(9):1449-57. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho. 2000. PMID: 10969605 Review. Japanese.
-
Software to compute and conduct sequential Bayesian phase I or II dose-ranging clinical trials with stopping rules.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2003 Oct;72(2):117-25. doi: 10.1016/s0169-2607(02)00120-7. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2003. PMID: 12941516 Review.
Cited by
-
Advances in Statistical Approaches Oncology Drug Development.Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Jan;48(1):81-89. doi: 10.1177/2168479013501309. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014. PMID: 25949927 Free PMC article.
-
Phase 1 trial of navitoclax and sorafenib in patients with relapsed or refractory solid tumors with hepatocellular carcinoma expansion cohort.Invest New Drugs. 2024 Feb;42(1):127-135. doi: 10.1007/s10637-024-01420-8. Epub 2024 Jan 25. Invest New Drugs. 2024. PMID: 38270822 Clinical Trial.
-
Bayesian Optimal Interval Design: A Simple and Well-Performing Design for Phase I Oncology Trials.Clin Cancer Res. 2016 Sep 1;22(17):4291-301. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0592. Epub 2016 Jul 12. Clin Cancer Res. 2016. PMID: 27407096 Free PMC article.
-
A modified toxicity probability interval method for dose-finding trials.Clin Trials. 2010 Dec;7(6):653-63. doi: 10.1177/1740774510382799. Epub 2010 Oct 8. Clin Trials. 2010. PMID: 20935021 Free PMC article.
-
Stopping rules for phase I clinical trials with dose expansion cohorts.Stat Methods Med Res. 2022 Feb;31(2):334-347. doi: 10.1177/09622802211064996. Epub 2021 Dec 24. Stat Methods Med Res. 2022. PMID: 34951338 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Other Literature Sources