Use of double gloves to protect the surgeon from blood contact during aesthetic procedures
- PMID: 7668175
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00451102
Use of double gloves to protect the surgeon from blood contact during aesthetic procedures
Abstract
The potential for blood contact with nonintact skin puts operating room personnel at an increased risk of exposure to hepatitis or HIV virus. Frank needle-stick injury to the surgeon has been shown to occur once every 20-40 operations. It has been shown that blood contact exposure during aesthetic surgery occurs in 32% of the operations in which a single pair of surgical gloves is used (surgeon 39.7%, assistant 23%). The reduction of blood contact exposure during aesthetic surgical procedures by using two pairs of gloves was tested and demonstrated. Contact rates decreased by 70%. Outer-glove perforations occurred in 25.6% of the cases, while inner-glove perforations occurred in only 10% of the cases (surgeon 8.7%, assistant 3.5%). All of the inner-glove perforations occurred during procedures that lasted longer than two hours, and in no case was there an inner-glove defect without a corresponding outer-glove perforation. The nondominant index finger (33%) was the most common location. Double gloving during aesthetic procedures reduced the operating room personnel's risk of blood contact exposure by 70% when compared with single-glove use.
Similar articles
-
[Double gloving in reducing the interoperative risk of blood borne pathogens].Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004;69(4):249-54. Chir Narzadow Ruchu Ortop Pol. 2004. PMID: 15587381 Polish.
-
Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.Postgrad Med J. 2001 Jul;77(909):458-60. doi: 10.1136/pmj.77.909.458. Postgrad Med J. 2001. PMID: 11423598 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery.AORN J. 2012 Mar;95(3):328-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2011.04.027. AORN J. 2012. PMID: 22381552
-
Use of double gloving to reduce surgical personnel's risk of exposure to bloodborne pathogens: an integrative review.AORN J. 2013 Dec;98(6):585-596.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.aorn.2013.10.004. AORN J. 2013. PMID: 24266931 Review.
-
[Surgical gloves--how well do the protect against infections?].Gesundheitswesen. 1999 Aug-Sep;61(8-9):398-403. Gesundheitswesen. 1999. PMID: 10535220 Review. German.
Cited by
-
Sharps injuries: the risks and relevance to plastic surgeons.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Apr;131(4):784-791. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818bae. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013. PMID: 23542251 Free PMC article.
-
Knowledge, attitude, and practices related to standard precautions of surgeons and physicians in university-affiliated hospitals of Shiraz, Iran.Int J Infect Dis. 2007 May;11(3):213-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Jul 11. Int J Infect Dis. 2007. PMID: 16837226 Free PMC article.
-
Double gloving to reduce surgical cross-infection.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;2006(3):CD003087. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003087.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006. PMID: 16855997 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Medical