Letter: Not so double-blind?
- PMID: 766898
- PMCID: PMC1638982
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.1.6007.457-d
Letter: Not so double-blind?
Similar articles
-
A consideration of the guidelines for investigating potential new drugs in humans in the United Kingdom.Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Apr;1(1):45-50. Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 1979. PMID: 552581 No abstract available.
-
Pharmaceutical development and specification of stereoisomers.J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998 Sep 1;17(6-7):917-24. doi: 10.1016/s0731-7085(98)00059-4. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998. PMID: 9884183 Review.
-
Effectiveness/efficacy difference too often ignored.Manag Care. 2013 Jan;22(1):36. Manag Care. 2013. PMID: 23373138 No abstract available.
-
Letter: Not so double-blind?Br Med J. 1976 Mar 20;1(6011):710. Br Med J. 1976. PMID: 766910 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial. No abstract available.
-
Improvement of phase III psychotropic drug trials by intensive phase II work.Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991 Jun;4(4):251-8; discussion 259-71. Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991. PMID: 1867735 Review.
Cited by
-
Assessing clinical trials--first steps.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 May 16;282(6276):1605-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.282.6276.1605. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981. PMID: 6786582 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Assessing clinical trials- double-blind trials.Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981 Jul 11;283(6284):122-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.283.6284.122. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1981. PMID: 6789934 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources