Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality
- PMID: 7673764
- DOI: 10.1007/BF01844707
Accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography: importance of image quality
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to investigate which factors could influence the accuracy of aortic stenosis severity assessment by Doppler echocardiography in an unselected population. Doppler echocardiographic determination of mean transvalvular pressure gradient and aortic valve area by continuity equation was performed in 101 patients before catheterization. According to the catheterization data, aortic stenosis was classified into 2 categories: mild to moderate (orifice area [Gorlin formula] > 0.75 cm2, mean transvalvular gradient < 50 mmHg) and severe (orifice area < or = 0.75 cm2, mean transvalvular gradient > or = 50 mmHg). The influence of eight factors on the absolute difference in aortic valve area and mean transvalvular pressure gradient and on the concordant classification in the same category by both methods was investigated.
Results: By multivariate analysis, the absolute difference in aortic valve area by both methods was significantly associated with poor image quality, absolute difference between mean catheterization and Doppler transvalvular gradient and inversely related to body mass index. Absolute difference in mean transvalvular gradients by both methods was significantly associated only with image quality. Poor image quality emerged as the only significant factor influencing the concordant classification between invasive and noninvasive studies according to orifice area (but not according to transvalvular pressure gradient).
Conclusion: Echographic image quality significantly influences the accuracy of Doppler echocardiographic determination of aortic valve area and, to a lesser extent, of transvalvular pressure gradient. Therefore, the mere noninvasive approach is not suitable to every consecutive patient with aortic stenosis. Qualifications concerning overall image quality should identify patients most likely to benefit from catheterization.
Similar articles
-
Aortic valve area discrepancy by Gorlin equation and Doppler echocardiography continuity equation: relationship to flow in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.Can J Cardiol. 2000 Aug;16(8):985-92. Can J Cardiol. 2000. PMID: 10978934
-
Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994 Nov 1;24(5):1342-50. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)90118-x. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994. PMID: 7930259 Clinical Trial.
-
Quantification of aortic stenosis in mechanically ventilated patients using multiplane transesophageal Doppler echocardiography.Chest. 1998 Jul;114(1):94-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.114.1.94. Chest. 1998. PMID: 9674453
-
Using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of aortic valve area in aortic valve stenosis.Herz. 2006 Oct;31(7):650-7. doi: 10.1007/s00059-006-2907-6. Herz. 2006. PMID: 17072778 Review.
-
Expert consensus document on the assessment of the severity of aortic valve stenosis by echocardiography to provide diagnostic conclusiveness by standardized verifiable documentation.Clin Res Cardiol. 2020 Mar;109(3):271-288. doi: 10.1007/s00392-019-01539-2. Epub 2019 Sep 3. Clin Res Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 31482241 Review.
Cited by
-
A comparison of echocardiographic and electron beam computed tomographic assessment of aortic valve area in patients with valvular aortic stenosis.Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007 Dec;23(6):781-8. doi: 10.1007/s10554-007-9208-x. Epub 2007 Feb 7. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2007. PMID: 17285263 Free PMC article.
-
Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography.Korean J Radiol. 2010 Mar-Apr;11(2):169-77. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2010.11.2.169. Epub 2010 Feb 22. Korean J Radiol. 2010. PMID: 20191064 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of aortic stenosis by three-dimensional echocardiography: an accurate and novel approach.Heart. 2007 Jul;93(7):801-7. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.110726. Epub 2007 May 8. Heart. 2007. PMID: 17488766 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluation of aortic stenosis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with established routine clinical techniques.Heart. 2004 Aug;90(8):893-901. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.022376. Heart. 2004. PMID: 15253962 Free PMC article.