Prognostic factors for gastric cancer influencing clinical practice
- PMID: 7676690
- DOI: 10.1007/BF00294709
Prognostic factors for gastric cancer influencing clinical practice
Abstract
Despite a slow decline in the incidence of gastric cancer over the last 90 years, we can still expect to see over 100,000 patients die of this disease each decade in England and Wales. The 5-year survival rate has not improved during this century, which is largely due to the stage at diagnosis being unchanged. There are a number of prognostic determinants in gastric cancer which have clinical relevance. Age is an important determinant; patients under 40 years commonly have more advanced diffuse lesions than older patients so that a higher index of suspicion needs to be maintained in younger patients with persistent symptoms. Conflicting reports make it unclear whether the duration of symptoms bears any relationship to tumor stage, but there is some evidence that actively shortening the symptom duration by early investigation can have a beneficial effect in the proportion of patients diagnosed with early cancers. The site of the tumor is important; unfortunately, the proportion of patients with cardia lesions is increasing and this has had the effect of reducing the overall survival. Tumor size should not play a part in the decision to resect a lesion as most studies show no clear relationship between tumor size and stage. Tumor stage is the most important prognostic determinant and efforts to increase the proportion of stage I cancers presenting for surgery can be shown to alter the natural history of the disease, by diagnosing it when it is still surgically curable.
Similar articles
-
Cancer of the stomach. A patient care study by the American College of Surgeons.Ann Surg. 1993 Nov;218(5):583-92. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199321850-00002. Ann Surg. 1993. PMID: 8239772 Free PMC article.
-
[DNA ploidy pattern as an indicator of degree of malignancy and prognosis in gastric cancer].Nihon Rinsho. 1992 Oct;50(10):2401-7. Nihon Rinsho. 1992. PMID: 1447810 Japanese.
-
[Clinical significance of prognostic nutritional index in patients with advanced gastric cancer].Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Feb 25;21(2):180-184. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018. PMID: 29492917 Chinese.
-
Consideration of tumor size improves the accuracy of TNM predictions in patients with gastric cancer after curative gastrectomy.Surg Oncol. 2013 Sep;22(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2013.05.002. Epub 2013 Jun 18. Surg Oncol. 2013. PMID: 23787074 Review.
-
Symptoms and diagnosis of gastric cancer at early curable stage.Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(4):697-708. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2006.03.015. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006. PMID: 16997154 Review.
Cited by
-
Prognostic and predictive value of metastatic lymph node ratio in stage III gastric cancer after D2 nodal dissection.Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 7;8(41):70841-70846. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19998. eCollection 2017 Sep 19. Oncotarget. 2017. PMID: 29050324 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of 154 actual five-year survivors of gastric cancer.J Gastrointest Surg. 2000 Sep-Oct;4(5):520-5. doi: 10.1016/s1091-255x(00)80095-5. J Gastrointest Surg. 2000. PMID: 11077328
-
Outcome analysis of laporoscopic D1 and D2 dissection in patients 70 years and older with gastric cancer.Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014 Oct 15;7(10):3501-11. eCollection 2014. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014. PMID: 25419390 Free PMC article.
-
High expression of cAMP-responsive element-binding protein 1 (CREB1) is associated with metastasis, tumor stage and poor outcome in gastric cancer.Oncotarget. 2015 Apr 30;6(12):10646-57. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3392. Oncotarget. 2015. PMID: 25825983 Free PMC article.
-
Clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with gastric cancer: a single-center experience.World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(14):2154-61. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i14.2154. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23599641 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Medical