Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
- PMID: 7680764
- DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma
Abstract
Background: CHOP is a first-generation, combination-chemotherapy regimen consisting of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone that has cured approximately 30 percent of patients with advanced stages of intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in national cooperative-group trials. However, studies at single institutions have suggested that 55 to 65 percent of such patients might be cured by third-generation regimens such as ones consisting of low-dose methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, bleomycin, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and dexamethasone (m-BACOD); prednisone, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide, followed by cytarabine, bleomycin, vincristine, and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue (ProMACE-CytaBOM); and methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone, and bleomycin (MACOP-B).
Methods: To make a valid comparison of these regimens, the Southwest Oncology Group and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group initiated a prospective, randomized phase III trial. The study end points were the response rate, time to treatment failure, overall survival, and incidence of severe or life-threatening toxicity. Dose intensity was calculated and analyzed.
Results: Of the 1138 patients registered for the trial, 899 were eligible. Each treatment group contained at least 218 patients. Known prognostic factors were equally distributed among the groups. There were no significant differences among the groups in the rates of partial and complete response. At three years, 44 percent of all patients were alive without disease; there were no significant differences between the groups (41 percent in the CHOP and MACOP-B groups and 46 percent in the m-BACOD and ProMACE-CytaBOM groups; P = 0.35). Overall survival at three years was 52 percent (50 percent in the ProMACE-CytaBOM and MACOP-B groups, 52 percent in the m-BACOD group, and 54 percent in the CHOP group; P = 0.90). There was no subgroup of patients in which survival was improved by a third-generation regimen. Fatal toxic reactions occurred in 1 percent of the CHOP group, 3 percent of the ProMACE-CytaBOM group, 5 percent of the m-BACOD group, and 6 percent of the MACOP-B group (P = 0.09).
Conclusions: CHOP remains the best available treatment for patients with advanced-stage intermediate-grade or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Comment in
-
CHOP versus intensive regimens in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):580-1; author reply 581-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199308193290817. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 7687747 No abstract available.
-
CHOP versus intensive regimens in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med. 1993 Aug 19;329(8):581; author reply 581-2. N Engl J Med. 1993. PMID: 8336764 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
A phase III comparison of CHOP vs. m-BACOD vs. ProMACE-CytaBOM vs. MACOP-B in patients with intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of SWOG-8516 (Intergroup 0067), the National High-Priority Lymphoma Study.Ann Oncol. 1994;5 Suppl 2:91-5. doi: 10.1093/annonc/5.suppl_2.s91. Ann Oncol. 1994. PMID: 7515652 Clinical Trial.
-
Southwest Oncology Group clinical trials for intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.Semin Hematol. 1988 Apr;25(2 Suppl 2):17-22. Semin Hematol. 1988. PMID: 2456619
-
Comparison of a second-generation combination chemotherapeutic regimen (m-BACOD) with a standard regimen (CHOP) for advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.N Engl J Med. 1992 Nov 5;327(19):1342-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199211053271903. N Engl J Med. 1992. PMID: 1383819 Clinical Trial.
-
Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002 May;49 Suppl 1:S13-20. doi: 10.1007/s00280-002-0447-1. Epub 2002 Apr 12. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2002. PMID: 12042984 Review.
-
The place of third-generation regimens in the treatment of adult aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.Ann Oncol. 1991 Jan;2 Suppl 1:37-41. doi: 10.1093/annonc/2.suppl_1.37. Ann Oncol. 1991. PMID: 1710488 Review.
Cited by
-
Cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in the treatment of stage IE/IIE extranodal natural killer/T cell lymphoma, nasal type: 13-year follow-up in 135 patients.Int J Hematol. 2012 Nov;96(5):617-23. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1174-y. Epub 2012 Sep 16. Int J Hematol. 2012. PMID: 22983648 Clinical Trial.
-
A specific mode of microsatellite instability is a crucial biomarker in adult T-cell leukaemia/lymphoma patients.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Mar;143(3):399-408. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2294-1. Epub 2016 Oct 25. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27783137 Free PMC article.
-
Construction and characterization of an anti-CD20 mAb nanocomb with exceptionally excellent lymphoma-suppressing activity.Int J Nanomedicine. 2015 Jul 30;10:4783-96. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S80129. eCollection 2015. Int J Nanomedicine. 2015. PMID: 26257518 Free PMC article.
-
New Challenges in the Management of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Treat Strategies Hematol. 2012 Jan;2(1):68-73. Treat Strategies Hematol. 2012. PMID: 23805376 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the oral cavity: germinal center classification.Head Neck Pathol. 2010 Sep;4(3):181-91. doi: 10.1007/s12105-010-0184-4. Epub 2010 Jun 9. Head Neck Pathol. 2010. PMID: 20533006 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials