Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 1993 May;142(5):1339-46.

Detection of N-myc gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diagnostic utility for neuroblastoma

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Detection of N-myc gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Diagnostic utility for neuroblastoma

D N Shapiro et al. Am J Pathol. 1993 May.

Abstract

We assessed fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) as an alternative to Southern blot analysis for determination of N-myc gene amplification in neuroblastoma. In the 44 pediatric solid tumor cell lines examined (20 neuroblastomas), the mean number of N-myc copies determined by FISH correlated closely with Southern blot results. There was wide intercellular variability in gene copy number in tumors that had evidence of amplification; however, tumors judged to be non-amplified completely lacked any cells with high N-myc copy number. FISH provided reliable estimates of N-myc amplification in 12 clinical samples even when the percentage of tumor was low. The other advantages of FISH over Southern blot analysis were speed and technical simplicity, ability to discern heterogeneous gene amplification among tumor cells in the same specimen, and capacity to determine the source of the amplified N-myc signal, whether extrachromosomal double-minute chromosomes, expanded intrachromosomal regions, or chromosome 2 aneuploidy. We conclude that FISH would refine the analysis of N-myc amplification in neuroblastoma and thus improve the assignment of patients to prognostic groups based on this unfavorable risk factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cancer Res. 1981 Nov;41(11 Pt 1):4678-86 - PubMed
    1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jun 15;89(12):5321-5 - PubMed
    1. Nature. 1984 Mar 15-21;308(5956):288-91 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1984 Apr 20;224(4646):256-62 - PubMed
    1. Science. 1984 Jun 8;224(4653):1121-4 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources