Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 May;42(5):281-8.

[Treatment of chronic ventricular extrasystole by propafenone (600 mg/d) in 2 or 3 daily doses]

[Article in French]
Affiliations
  • PMID: 7690219
Clinical Trial

[Treatment of chronic ventricular extrasystole by propafenone (600 mg/d) in 2 or 3 daily doses]

[Article in French]
H Lardoux et al. Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris). 1993 May.

Abstract

The efficacy of propafenone by oral route in the treatment of chronic ventricular extrasystoles (VES) was investigated in 14 subjects in the context of a multicenter evaluation carried out double blind and using a crossover sequence. The purpose of this study was to compare the antiarrhythmic efficacy of a dose of 600 mg/d of propafenone randomly divided into two or three subdoses. After carrying out two Holter recordings (< 15 days) the patients presenting with chronic (< or = 100 VES/H) and stable (interindividual variability > or = 30%) ventricular extrasystoles were included. The treatment period consisted of two 8-day courses divided by a placebo period and carried out following a crossover mode. The efficacy of treatment was defined as a reduction in the VES by at least 70% relative to the second Holter during the inclusion period which was used as the reference period. Fourteen patients (57.2 +/- 18.2 years) from eight cardiological centers (eight with heart disease) were included. In general, propafenone at a dose of 600 mg/d bid or tid significantly reduced the total number of VES by about 65%: 15,239 +/- 2,663 VES/24 h (baseline) to 5,238 +/- 2,746 VES/24 h (bid) and 5,765 +/- 2683 VES/24 h (tid); p < 0.0001, with no significant difference between the bid and tid treatments. Individually, 8 patients (57%) responded during the bid treatment, 7 patients (50%) during the tid treatment and 6 patients during both treatments.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer