Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1993 Jul;40(7):625-31.
doi: 10.1007/BF03009699.

Low-dose aprotinin infusion is not clinically useful to reduce bleeding and transfusion of homologous blood products in high-risk cardiac surgical patients

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Low-dose aprotinin infusion is not clinically useful to reduce bleeding and transfusion of homologous blood products in high-risk cardiac surgical patients

J F Hardy et al. Can J Anaesth. 1993 Jul.

Abstract

A high-dose regimen of aprotinin 5-6 million KIU is effective in reducing bleeding and the need for homologous blood products (HBP) associated with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). These high doses aim at achieving plasmin and plasma kallikrein concentrations which in vitro are inhibitory but, theoretically, smaller doses could suffice in vivo. Also, aprotinin is an expensive drug, so efficiency requires using the smallest effective dose. Therefore, the efficacy of prophylactic aprotinin 1 million KIU (the maximal dose approved currently) was evaluated in a patient population at high risk of bleeding and of being transfused. Forty-one patients undergoing reoperation or a complex surgical procedure were included in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study. Before skin incision, a bolus of 200,000 KIU aprotinin was administered in 20 min, followed by an infusion of 100,000 KIU.hr-1 over eight hours. Control patients received an equal volume of saline. Dryness of the operative field, chest drainage, transfusion of HBP, haemoglobin concentrations, and coagulation variables (including bleeding time) were compared. There were no differences between aprotinin and placebo-treated patients for all clinical and laboratory variables. The apparent ineffectiveness of aprotinin may be explained by the use of an insufficient dose, by a different protocol of administration (e.g., no bolus in CPB prime), or by the inability of aprotinin to decrease bleeding and transfusions any further. Also, the number of patients studied does not exclude the possibility of a Type II error.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1968 Jun 28;146(2):754-62 - PubMed
    1. Drugs. 1985 Mar;29(3):236-61 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1987 Dec 5;2(8571):1289-91 - PubMed
    1. Arzneimittelforschung. 1983;33(4):479-94 - PubMed
    1. Anesthesiology. 1991 Sep;75(3):426-32 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources