Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1995 Apr;151(4):993-9.
doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/151.4.993.

Interfacing between spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation affects ventilation-perfusion distributions in experimental bronchoconstriction

Affiliations

Interfacing between spontaneous breathing and mechanical ventilation affects ventilation-perfusion distributions in experimental bronchoconstriction

C Putensen et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995 Apr.

Abstract

The effect of interfacing between spontaneous and mechanical ventilation on ventilation-perfusion (VA/Q) distributions was determined during pressure-support ventilation (PSV) and in the presence and absence of spontaneous breathing during biphasic positive airway pressure (BIPAP) in 10 pigs with methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction. Whereas BIPAP without spontaneous breathing provides full and PSV breath-to-breath synchronized ventilatory support, BIPAP allows unrestricted spontaneous breathing throughout the mechanical cycle. Compared with BIPAP with and without spontaneous breathing, PSV effected an increase in ventilatory rate (p < 0.05) and a higher minute ventilation (VE) (p < 0.05). Spontaneous breathing during BIPAP accounted for 15 +/- 1% of the VE and increased cardiac output (CO) from 4.5 +/- 0.2 to 5.3 +/- 0.2 L/min (p < 0.05), Pao2 from 55 +/- 3 to 80 +/- 4 mm Hg (p < 0.05), and oxygen delivery (DO2) from 442 +/- 39 to 630 +/- 43 ml/min (p < 0.05). PSV did not increase CO, Pao2, and DO2. Spontaneous breathing did not affect oxygen consumption. During BIPAP spontaneous breathing accounted for a 15 +/- 2% decrease (p < 0.05) in blood flow to shunt units and a 16 +/- 2% increase (p < 0.05) in the perfusion of normal VA/Q units. Perfusion of shunt and normal VA/Q units was similar during PSV and BIPAP without spontaneous breathing. Dead space ventilation decreased with spontaneous breathing during BIPAP by 12% compared with PSV (p < 0.05). Dispersion of ventilation distribution was lowest during BIPAP. Uncoupling of spontaneous and mechanical ventilation during BIPAP improved gas exchange by allowing better VA/Q matching during experimental bronchoconstriction.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources